安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
We need a war.
Because the majority of those people could be loosely translated as "I want your money too".
That said, you can expect them to say "I mean people richer than me, billioniares, not multimillionaires, they're the ones I meant"
if you mean it less litteral..you just lower the income gap.
it depends how strict it is done what the effect is..
if you merely limit the gap between the richest person in the nation and the poorest in yearly income x10 and in wealth x100 and tax away when you get above that... I think thats good for a society...
but if the gap gets too small than i see it being detrimental for than you start to feel that working no longer is rewarded...
so fairness both demands a wealth gap existing.. but also it not being to unreasonable bit.
and in many developed nations the wealthgap is now way way to large..
it used to be the labourer in the factory ate ground beaf.. while the director and mayor lived in the same city in a house about 2x the size and could eat steak... the income gap was about 7 times between the owner and lowest paid employee in early industrial time..
however today besos and his lowest paid employee thats gap of millions times the difference.. and thats just not good for a society..
you have however idiotic communists who target even the middleclass aka anybody not on welfare/minimumwage.. those are not just after fearness.. those are just jealous aholes of everybody having more than them and they will destroy the nation if you let them go their way..