安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
You think she went down there to do something bad?
Yawn.
Deal with it.
Don't like it, leave it.
MAGA!
Let me know when you want to answer.
"OMG TIFFANY FROM HOUSE KEEPING WENT DOWN AND CLEANED JEFF'S HOUSE!!!!! SHE MUST BE UP TO NO GOOD"
Please expand on that one.
https://www.google.com/
The thing is nobody really would have cared except he is doing such a phenomenally bad job that we all want him out of there the soonest along with the rest of his administration.
Well, you asked, if there is something in the files besides a list of people vistting. The answer is: We do not know. Because people are preventing from releasing those files. So you the one claiming, that the files won't prove anything. Cool. Then release them so we can know, that they actually don't prove anything. But since we don't have them yet, we don't know, if there is actually more substantial to them, that could implicate people and justify further, more detailed investigations.
So you are essentially defending potential pedophiles by saying, that we don't have evidence for them but at the same time don't want the evidence to be released, because there is no evidence. Which is circular.
Since you could not reply to my argument, I accept your concession of defeat.
Have a nice day.
lol @ Argument online.