安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
video games aren't a "need"
I thought Warzone 2100 was quite good back then.
However, that doesn't actually matter -- I'm always in favor of letting companies do any game they want to do, and leaving it to customers such as myself to decide whether I want to buy it or not. That's what a "free market" is all about.
Is there a guarantee that I will buy it? Definitely not. I've played a lot of Warcraft II and Diablo II back then, but... I haven't bought anything Blizzard since. It would be same for Warzone -- it really depends on what they come up with. I don't drool over names.