安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
If they removed the bloat it would be better and still more than 10 hours
I can understand it for Open World Games that they will be longer because they are bigger Games but linear Games should be just 10 hours. An Open World with 10 hours would be like fresh air
No i dont watch Tiktok
Open world games are known for this, because not every part of the world you're exploring can be story-related. There's lore elements, side quests, items to find, etc that are all bloat, even in GOAT games like The Witcher 3.
It's just the nature of the beast.
Thats true. And why i think a compact Open World with 10 hours could be intense and like a fresh air
Good for you but you probably play Fortnite on mobile while playing land-hockey in the schoolyard after drinking 10 RedBull and 1 coffee with cream and a little bit of sugar because your mom allowed it. Then you speedrun Minecraft because you want to be like forsen and xqc.
I think 10 hours would be good
If im tired of a game. Better shorter Games
Then you play only one Game in your life if you get older