安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
85 
举报此帖
If he acknowledged Trump he would have to admit his own failures when it came to Israel and Gaza.
Still not as bad as the arrogance of Biden officials who have the balls to say Trump followed their plan. LMFAO ... these are the people who got Americans killed leaving Afghanistan.
Yet another reason to be grateful I no longer vote Democrat for decades.
Military personnel politicization is pretty complicated and revolves around neocons politicizing the military in the 1980s, and also in the 1790s by the democrat faction. It's one of the oldest conflicts in the Democrat-Republican party, and it puts the military in an awkward position because the Republicans were the ones that favored a depoliticized military; and this has caused the military to align with them out of a sense of honor.
So against the spirit of what this historic relationship represents, if a democrat is in office and handling a pullout a republican ordered they tend to send 'democrat designated' personnel who aren't always the people best suited to handling the issue; for instance, they aren't the people who have been handling it so far. the same was true of early obama era step-downs and withdrawals; accelerating them caused personnel shifts that resulted in casualties.
the people they choose are competent, but the simple act of involving the political necessity of choosing personnel based on politics induces casualties at bake sales, let alone withdrawals.
People Born in the 80's: "Does he know?"