安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



But more likely new ways to make nukes still relevant, such as new delivery systems like stealth missiles.
Forcefields are such advanced tech for us right now that it may as well be magic.
While possible and probable, you can't make such a big satellite that can't be shot down from Earth. An orbital laser cannon would be destroyed with missiles fired from Earth and would never be a thing.
But You could erase whole populations which them without much harm to the infrastructure. Some might be hard to control, or get out of control...
Nukes are seen as dangerous, because they create a big explosion, and some might dislike the radiation, and reaching immortality by becoming a ghoul. But You can´t see chemical or biological weapons - so they´re unspectacular.
In general it´s more about propaganda though. Like, psychological warfare.
Like: what if we have weapons to defend against nukes, which is the reason why they´re never used. Because if they would use them, and the other country would successfully defend - then the statistics that countries rarely declare war on a country which has nukes, might go in the bin.
'Rods from God' also come to mind.
Not missiles in the conventional sense. Solid 'telephone pole-sized' tungsten-steel rods, shaped for re-entry and guided to targets via satellite/GPS. They are hypersonic, will be many times faster than today's fastest missiles, and will potentially hit far harder, as they will originate from a satellite in Earth's orbit.
A weapon system like that, which has been conceived already decades ago and may even exist, promises to be almost unstoppable with existing, and even theoretical tech like anti-missile lasers.
Nothing can be safe from missile barrages fired from the surface.
option A.. you somehow can locate all other nations nukes and with a single shot destroy them all in their bunkers...
***what is going to prevent them from building new ones?
***and all those nukes exploding will create a nucleair winter.. and fallout that will also cause problems in your own nation...
option B you 100% can shoot them out the air.. again.. that means they explode or if not you explode a dirty bomb.. which will rain down... if not on your nation than on the ocean or europe or whatever nation is between you and them... times 1000.. again with dire consequences...
**
neither would be what you want... plus it would not prevent the nuke in orbit that would emp your entire nation.
also interception of missiles would still not exclude locally ignited bombs (suitcase bombs)
but ok lets surpass believability and go into science finction... what we are not even close to inventing but could be possible presume you have created a bacteria or nanite that eats radiactive material and somehow renders it inert/changes it in a non radiactive atom.. (controilled cold fission).. well it only work if you let it eat everything so you also loose nucleair powerplants including those on your aircraftcarriers and submarines. as well as nucleair isotopes for medical treatment..
well than.. it will be more likely people go attack.. as conflicts turn more conventional.,.
chemical warfare and biological warfare is the first though... they went away alongside nucleair... with nucleair gone.. you can bet they are back on the menu.... especially with the advances in bioenginering.. you want a disease that only kills people with 1 speciffic gene... aka 1 speciffic race.. you can....
than there are ideas like a satelite with tungsten rods in a satelite in orbit... they would have about a 10kt impact.. thats as much as a small nuke...
-> magnetic guns able to fire off such rods on land still are problematic.. we can build them.. but the barrel is unusable after few shots... the power requitements are insane (so much that even a nucleair powered ship would not produce enough power to carry one)
and the capacitors burn.. in other words.. we cannot create a functional usually one.. YET
and we also see more bombs like the bunker buster being made..
no need to create a
Because if only the nuke holder have it, it won't change much. They can bully everyone else like before.
But if everyone have it, an unlikely scenario.
Then the war of conquest begins. If you live in a weak country then I hope you earn a quick death instead of being slaves.