Nope

Oprindeligt skrevet af EASY PETE:

Nope

Dynamite still has its place in the world no need to get grouchy because they used streams and nuclear things.

Also nope.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Zogtar:

Also nope.

Okay why not?
And did you like the original?

Well...

It was at least a better attempt than whatever the heck that abomination before that was.

Oprindeligt skrevet af Corvus XIII:

Oprindeligt skrevet af EASY PETE:

Nope

Dynamite still has its place in the world no need to get grouchy because they used streams and nuclear things.

My 32798473298749328 dynamite sticks begs to differ with these so called nuclear weapons

Oprindeligt skrevet af Corvus XIII:

Oprindeligt skrevet af Zogtar:

Also nope.

Okay why not?
And did you like the original?

Love the original, like the second one.

Afterlife was by the numbers (I mixed it up with the frozen one). To me, it wasn't bad, but it wasn't good. It was at least better than the Answer the Call "Ha ha fat lady fall down and angry leslie jones does leslie jones things" trash fiesta.

-Mini Stay Puft marshmallow men are here for member berries
-Paul Rudd does Paul Rudd stuff
-all the original Ghostbusters are back, except... kinda not. They use CG to bring back a dead actor to what he looked like in the 80's... which is kinda perverse, but okay, Hollywood decides to revive dead actors with CG already...

You can tell this film was trying to make new fans of the series, while trying to keep old fans happy.

I'm okay with it, just didn't work for me.

Ghostbusters: Afterlife is so scientific and i like it. It has a very interesting story.

I was not dissapointed by it, was pretty good. But pretty good is not memorable either

Oprindeligt skrevet af PRSPLayer02:

Ghostbusters: Afterlife is so scientific and i like it. It has a very interesting story.

Me and Lizzietheratcicle15 went to see it, together.

No. The only recent movie I've watched recently is Chainsaw Man – The Movie: Reze Arc
Best movie I've seen in a while.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux3QETpLcPs

Oprindeligt skrevet af Zogtar:

-all the original Ghostbusters are back, except... kinda not. They use CG to bring back a dead actor to what he looked like in the 80's... which is kinda perverse, but okay, Hollywood decides to revive dead actors with CG already...

They asked the family for permission to use his likeness, and after viewing the film said his portrayal was tasteful and they had no objections. Note he never spoke, that was at the family's request I believe.

Overall the movie was ok, felt a bit campy for me, but in general 6/10 not bad not great.

Ghostbusters was kind of ruined for me. I'll stick to the classics.

But, I'm glad you liked it.

I looked at the trap ray.

I thought it was reasonably good. But Paul Rudd didn't seem right in it, nothing against him per se but I don't think good fit for Ghostbusters.

If you look at the 4 original Ghostbusters they all had something interesting and quirky about them, Paul Rudd in contrast just seems ... boring.