安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



John J. Rambo for example. A partisan. His hacks are blue light, and a multi functional knife.
No - but like people who try to free the country when it gets invaded by someone else. They should be treated as POW, regardless their army status.
So yes - kind of unwilling to acknowledge opposing views...
Hmm - and why not have ChatGPT ask the questions, and give the answers, so all we need to do is watching what it writes? Just in case that some of us don´t use it at all.
Also the amount of partisan political hacks online is rather huge - which is why the term matters, even if there´s not even a term for it in my language. Like, fanatic is somehow shorter...