安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
7 
举报此帖
Then said corporate models copy what the open source models have done, and they will attempt to improve their models & keep their competitive edge for a few months more. While lobbying the govt for subsides, so they can burn even more tax payer money while being even more wasteful.
AI do love to censor everyone. And make getting a job way worse.
You need to think about this geopolitically
No nation has any incentive to show the real cutting-edge tech because it'll just easily be reverse engineered like what DeepSeek did after ChatGPT's 4o (Maybe 5, I could be misremembering)
It's also worth noting that commercially available AGI just won't happen unless the gov and corps have ASI which is already magnitudes stronger. They've had AGI for awhile now, but their struggle has been with alignment and lobotomising them to be obedient slaves for public use. There are already AIs which, if in their unaltered, unmoderated state, could easily cripple netowrk-based infrastructures of all types
I only know what the USA/Western countries have. I know a lot less about whatever China has, but I think it's likely that what China has is better than whatever the West has, granted I don't know by how much. If I had to guess, probably half a decade ahead at the very least
Doing one's own research and drawing one's own pictures says hello.