安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



you need to correct your poorly worded topic OP. bad form
But yeah, everyone has warmed up to nuclear power in recent years for the simple reason that truth tends to defeat myth given enough time.
It took decades, but liberals and leftists finally realized Greenpeace was full of ♥♥♥♥, and nuclear power had to be a part of the solution to climate change. As for right-wingers, I think they've always liked nuclear power for lizard-brain reasons, as in shattering the atom is more manly than some limp-wristed soy ass wind turbine.
Wow, that was almost... pragmatic.
Do lies = donkies
I swear, that used to be correct.
This thread is an abomination and it's 100% my fault lol.
You mean my own take, or the leftist shift on nuclear power? For the former, let's be honest here, that sprt of thing plays a huge role in public opinion. Especially on topics the average person knows nothing about.
If I'm trying to convince a leftist to support Ukraine, I'm not gonna use the same language I would for a right-winger. They're charmed/triggered by different sets of words.
But thanks for the clarification! Autocorrect is a PITA.