安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



Unfortunately I value dogs highly so that one thing makes Islam a complete no for me.
All religion is insane, but we also live in a place where you're allowed to be insane.
If I'm going to allow a person to believe that a dude rose from the dead, I'm also going to allow a person to believe a dude rode a flaming donkey into heaven.
Would I prefer no one be religious? Of course.
My critique of the NY mayor race is that once again moron socialist elected a rich kid that told them what they wanted to hear to get a great job and fail to provide what they ran on. Basically, every DNC campaign.
"more resistant to subversion" You mean blasphemy and apostasy laws? That just means they have no free speech. That is not a progressive value at all.
It rhymes too, you can't deny a rhyme.
ohh law and all. Well i'm ♥♥♥♥♥♥. Makes sense.