安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
3 
举报此帖
I completely agree, we have no business being there. Unfortunately, the war drags on mainly because Western nations keep financing Ukraine with weapons, intelligence, money, and even “volunteers.”
Ukraine isn’t part of the EU or NATO, so there’s no actual obligation to keep funding this conflict.
easy to see once you´ve understood how that all is suppossed to work
hot damn, those 10 billion, conservative estimate, in raw ressource stuck in the ground there
can´t be had... keep pouring more money, western tax slaves...
you will certainly profit from it one day.... ahahaha
and now, go ahead, smithe me, call me a rusky lover and whatnot... IDGAF
NATO isn’t Europe, it’s primarily an American-led military structure.
European forces participate, but the core decisions and logistics rely heavily on the United States. Without Washington, NATO wouldn’t function in practice, and Article 5 exists largely because the U.S. signature gives it weight.
Ukraine’s corruption and economic fragility have been documented for decades, much of its infrastructure dating back to the Soviet era. European countries, meanwhile, long depended on Russian energy and trade; that relationship kept living costs far lower than what we face now.
Since cutting ties with Russia and redirecting billions toward Ukraine, Europe has absorbed massive costs with limited returns. That’s just the reality on the ground. Claiming that Ukraine now contributes more to Europe than Russia ever did doesn’t line up with the facts.
France fought with honor, using its own army, its own resources, and its own strategy.
Ukraine, by contrast, relies heavily on continuous Western support, equipment, intelligence, and funding from the EU and the U.S. Without that, the outcome would likely have been very different.
France, when faced with defeat, made political and military decisions on its own terms. It has world-class industry, nuclear deterrence, a powerful air force, and a long military tradition built by its own people.
Its scientific, industrial, and historical legacy speaks for itself.
I’m not French myself, my heritage is partly Chinese but I respect France deeply. I only hope it will stop sacrificing its own interests for a conflict that doesn’t serve it.
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/discussions/forum/12/660467026274543234/#c660467026274544996
😂 Lies exposed again.
I have a THPI and I’m always right. Listen to me, it’s not going to happen. The U.S. doesn’t have enough of them, it’s costly, and it would change nothing on the ground. Another so-called Wonder Weapon, another political gesture that ends in disappointment.
Trump made a mistake getting dragged into this game. He was already humiliated dealing with Xi, and the same pattern will repeat in Ukraine. It’s his war now, whether he likes it or not but he won’t use Tomahawks. Mark my words.
And honestly, it’s strange: if Ukraine truly had a strong defense industry, why keep asking for American weapons?
Modern, beautiful, clean cities, no crime, no chaos, no reason to bomb them. I guess those are all negative points for you.
Who exactly? Since this is supposed to be a Russia–Ukraine conflict, are you saying Ukraine is developing nuclear weapons and plans to use them on Russia? That will never happen. Ukraine can’t even manufacture its own rifles or drones, everything they use is either imported or leftover Soviet gear.
Well done lads