Bro really doesn't comprehend the gap between 1,000,000,000 and 100,000,000.

Even if you have literally $0 you are closer in wealth to someone with $100,000,000 than someone with $100,000,000 is to someone else with $1,000,000,000.

If you are a billionaire and lose 100 millions, you are still pretty much a billionare.

before or after decimal points? How much spent or how much have?
5 digit is 100.00 9 digit is 1,000,000.00 ten million is never getting out of a million which is sad?

引用自 Kweeb：

Kweeb 6 minutes ago
    
A 9 digit net worth is okay but a 10 digit is bad

They should practice what they preach and distribute their own wealth not make other people give their money away.

Have 100 in bank and they fee it for not being more back in the day at certain places? Millionaire shows up and they start to waive it for everyone else.

Yeah they can put their money someplace else? Into a statue? Warehouses? Port authority over a dock? Pencils!

You could literally afford to throw 100 million in a fire if you have a billion.

引用自 shoopy：

You could literally afford to throw 100 million in a fire if you have a billion.

Not only that. You could do it again 8 times more and then still be extremely, filthy rich with 100 millions in your pocket.

引用自 shoopy：

You could literally afford to throw 100 million in a fire if you have a billion.

Drive a car with tread and no air on rims with no shocks an engine with burnt oil and fuel from 19BC. Gold standard was elevated past platinum and now planning to support 6 individuals instead of 50. Request for some type of cide. rrrrrrr or destiny?

引用自 Gorgle：

Bro really doesn't comprehend the gap between 1,000,000,000 and 100,000,000.

Even if you have literally $0 you are closer in wealth to someone with $100,000,000 than someone with $100,000,000 is to someone else with $1,000,000,000.

This is a math trick. Yes mathematically a person with 100,000,000 is closer to a homeless person with no net worth($).

But a person with even 20 million is closer in lifestyle to a billionaire than a homeless person. Its just a cope for champagne socialist streamers these days to use these obviously dubious talking point to defend the fact they are not working class.

引用自 Gorgle：

Bro really doesn't comprehend the gap between 1,000,000,000 and 100,000,000.

Even if you have literally $0 you are closer in wealth to someone with $100,000,000 than someone with $100,000,000 is to someone else with $1,000,000,000.

So 999 million net worth is okay

引用自 Kweeb：

They should practice what they preach and distribute their own wealth not make other people give their money away.

Yes, all these streamers out here talking about billionaires while bring in millions a year are just coping.

Even Bernie stopped talking about "millionaires and billionaire." Now he just complains about billionaires ever since the DNC and his friend Joe bought him off.

It's just stupid that they only complain about billionaires and never share their own wealth

Yeah, I agree 100%. People like Second Thought and Hasan Piker are just failed Andrew Tate man-verse influencers.

I had an argument with my friend defending Second Thought "cause he lives in society." I had to remind my friend if Fred Hampton existed today he would have built and provided for his community like he preached. He would have built even more infrastructure instead of a pool at his mansion.

They are all just modern fake leftist. They are actually grifters telling morons what they want to hear.

Nobody is obliged to give their own money away, especially to people who are whiny and will likely be ungrateful and spend the money on stupid ♥♥♥♥ and still continue to be miserable anyway

The multimillionaires could set an example instead of putting the burden on everyone richer than them but they do not, because obviously

At least that one British rapper stormzy did a charity scholarship where he'd sponsor people's uni

(Only if you're black lmfao)

Yeah really, a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ celebrity giving back but only if your skin is black. Imagine the reverse.

引用自 trash nyan：

Nobody is obliged to give their own money away, especially to people who are whiny and will likely be ungrateful and spend the money on stupid ♥♥♥♥ and still continue to be miserable anyway

The multimillionaires could set an example instead of putting the burden on everyone richer than them but they do not, because obviously

They don't want distribution of wealth. They want to distribution of other people's wealth...

引用自 El Mythical 23 k.s.c.：

引用自 Gorgle：

Bro really doesn't comprehend the gap between 1,000,000,000 and 100,000,000.

Even if you have literally $0 you are closer in wealth to someone with $100,000,000 than someone with $100,000,000 is to someone else with $1,000,000,000.

This is a math trick. Yes mathematically a person with 100,000,000 is closer to a homeless person with no net worth($).

But a person with even 20 million is closer in lifestyle to a billionaire than a homeless person. Its just a cope for champagne socialist streamers these days to use these obviously dubious talking point to defend the fact they are not working class.

Brother, I do not care what lifestyle millionaires and billionaires have. I care about how this sort of wealth distribution effects the lifestyles of a society as a whole. A billionaire could choose to live like a vagrant and it would still be a problem.

If anything, your line of argument only proves my point more by highlighting the utterly absurd excess of wealth when according to you a billionaire can lose 98% of their wealth and still live a life of extravagance far beyond the dreams of the common man with only $20,000,000.

I'm not even making the argument of defending millionaires, but this narrative suggesting that the wealth brackets of millionaires and billionaires are equivalent problems in even the most remote sense is absurd.

引用自 Gorgle：

引用自 El Mythical 23 k.s.c.：

This is a math trick. Yes mathematically a person with 100,000,000 is closer to a homeless person with no net worth($).

But a person with even 20 million is closer in lifestyle to a billionaire than a homeless person. Its just a cope for champagne socialist streamers these days to use these obviously dubious talking point to defend the fact they are not working class.

Brother, I do not care what lifestyle millionaires and billionaires have. I care about how this sort of wealth distribution effects the lifestyles of a society as a whole. A billionaire could choose to live like a vagrant and it would still be a problem.

If anything, your line of argument only proves my point more by highlighting the utterly absurd excess of wealth when according to you a billionaire can lose 98% of their wealth and still live a life of extravagance far beyond the dreams of the common man with only $20,000,000.

I'm not even making the argument of defending millionaires, but this narrative suggesting that the wealth brackets of millionaires and billionaires are equivalent problems in even the most remote sense is absurd.

Sure, I disagree with your framing. This is a cope from rich people today in the real world that have tens of million and pretend they are communist. Your grievous aside.

Brother i'm personally tired of these observations. Whats your point? You're mad cause someone else has a bunch of money. So what we need to do is bring down society cause half the fat ♥♥♥♥♥ in your local area on food stamps and subsidized housing aren't also billionaires?

What do you want man. Whats the solution? You taking their money and handing it out to others?? How does everyone get to live like a mutli millionaire? Whats the plan...