安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMyfEZ42Ylk
Hmm. They know the statistics. Those others know Your steam posts, Your other social media contributions, Your physical address, Your employer, Your health status, whatever You did wrong in Your life, and pictures of several states in Your life, while having a database about all kinds of communication You did, or when You were present in pictures others made and send online, or on official pictures, which games You play, what You buy, or where You usually move, what friends and family You have. To then be able to calculate how much of a risk You are - to then take action based on that. It´s like China´s idea, but better, because You don´t need so many cameras and stuff. It´s more environmental friendly, so it can´t be that bad...
Talk about buyer's remorse, I bought the Founders Edition at great cost and played it about 15 hours. Mostly because it's a really bad game but the experience also makes me not want to play. I'll never buy another 2K game again. They fully deserve their 1.2 stars rating.
Most of the counter-points that need to be made against your senseless take, were already made by smart educated people in these 2 videos who have research & visual examples supporting their anti-A.I. counterponts :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rzhpf1Ai7Z4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRzBk_KuIaM
It's precautionary tales like these that have me still coming to these toxic forums despite the gaslighting, toxicity, and lying moderators & lying Support members.
You've never given me any reason to ignore you and I've seen you around for quite a while, so I trust your statement on this matter.
Furthermore, even if we removed the typo of "w" that makes the Looney Tunes joke, and properly spell "rabbits", this is arguably relevant to the game thanks to metonymy :https://www.google.com/search?q=Does+Civ+7+have+rabbits
"AI Overview
Civilization 7 does not feature rabbits as a specific resource or unit.
The game includes a variety of different resources, such as Furs and Wild Game, which broadly represent hunting and animal products, but "rabbits" are not listed individually.
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+metonymy"metonymy : the substitution of the name of an attribute or adjunct for that of the thing meant, for example suit for business executive, or the track for horse racing."
Towards that end, rabbits and furs should be validly interchangeable within this context.Being more literate and educated and just NOT a prejudiced ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ like the people who are moderating, is not a socially valid reason for anyone to receive a ban anywhere - especially in a place where your bans in one community affect your standing in other communities.
The social aspect of games is very important to me, and for this reason, how such communities are moderated is very important to me, and for this reason,
I will also be adding 2K to my ignore list.
But yeah, anyone who thinks AI is supposedly infallible should look up GANs
(generative adversarial networks) and learn more about them.
This should scare everyone. Imagine going to prison for life, or worse, because someone generated AI content of you killing someone that, or more correctly "whom", never existed.