所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情
AI decisions cannot be appealed...
It's infallible. If you got banned because the AI determined you were at fault then there is no room for debate. Demanding a human audit is just a waste of resources, just accept your judgment.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 20 条留言
Hey man, youre the one who believes in the american corporate dream of inflated stock prices and AI simply being a tool to inflate said stock prices further
Vox 11 月 4 日 上午 5:00 
Just use AI to appeal to the AI.
Lime 11 月 4 日 上午 5:03 
skill issue
The computer can't make mistakes!
McFlurry Butts 11 月 4 日 上午 5:04 
It's really concerning that AI is being used to determine people's healthcare, but it's required to make lawful decisions none the less.
And on your left you're see a bot post run probably out of china knowing the statistics on the matter
Triple G 11 月 4 日 上午 5:47 
引用自 McFlurry Butts
It's really concerning that AI is being used to determine people's healthcare, but it's required to make lawful decisions none the less.
Imho what´s more concerning is that people might get shot because the AI says so - based on probability, and that all data is shared among the platforms - even classified official data.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMyfEZ42Ylk

And on your left you're see a bot post run probably out of china knowing the statistics on the matter
Hmm. They know the statistics. Those others know Your steam posts, Your other social media contributions, Your physical address, Your employer, Your health status, whatever You did wrong in Your life, and pictures of several states in Your life, while having a database about all kinds of communication You did, or when You were present in pictures others made and send online, or on official pictures, which games You play, what You buy, or where You usually move, what friends and family You have. To then be able to calculate how much of a risk You are - to then take action based on that. It´s like China´s idea, but better, because You don´t need so many cameras and stuff. It´s more environmental friendly, so it can´t be that bad...
最后由 Triple G 编辑于; 11 月 4 日 上午 5:48
Despiser 11 月 4 日 上午 6:06 
I believe that's what happened to me in Civ 7 community hub. When I included "I'm hunting wabbits" from an Elmer Fudd cartoon in a post, it led to a permanent ban. That's right, PERMANENT, with no prior bans. I appealed to Steam to no avail, they said 2K Games provide their own moderators. I wrote to 2K games asking if they agreed the ban was appropriate, to which they also said they don't overturn moderator decisions. I said I'm not asking to overturn, I just want to know if they agreed with it. They responded with a threat to pull my account altogether.
Talk about buyer's remorse, I bought the Founders Edition at great cost and played it about 15 hours. Mostly because it's a really bad game but the experience also makes me not want to play. I'll never buy another 2K game again. They fully deserve their 1.2 stars rating.
ZAP 11 月 4 日 上午 7:44 
Is AI handling spelling correction on websites search bars? It's worse than it's ever been getting the actual hit you search for.
引用自 SolidSonicMania
AI decisions cannot be appealed...

It's infallible. If you got banned because the AI determined you were at fault then there is no room for debate. Demanding a human audit is just a waste of resources, just accept your judgment.
Hope you enjoy Mecha-Hitler then.

Most of the counter-points that need to be made against your senseless take, were already made by smart educated people in these 2 videos who have research & visual examples supporting their anti-A.I. counterponts :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rzhpf1Ai7Z4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TRzBk_KuIaM
Corvus XIII 11 月 4 日 上午 8:21 
Anybody remember Priest and their confession booths?
引用自 Despiser
I believe that's what happened to me in Civ 7 community hub. When I included "I'm hunting wabbits" from an Elmer Fudd cartoon in a post, it led to a permanent ban. That's right, PERMANENT, with no prior bans. I appealed to Steam to no avail, they said 2K Games provide their own moderators. I wrote to 2K games asking if they agreed the ban was appropriate, to which they also said they don't overturn moderator decisions. I said I'm not asking to overturn, I just want to know if they agreed with it. They responded with a threat to pull my account altogether.
Talk about buyer's remorse, I bought the Founders Edition at great cost and played it about 15 hours. Mostly because it's a really bad game but the experience also makes me not want to play. I'll never buy another 2K game again. They fully deserve their 1.2 stars rating.
Thank you for sharing this story.
It's precautionary tales like these that have me still coming to these toxic forums despite the gaslighting, toxicity, and lying moderators & lying Support members.
    You've never given me any reason to ignore you and I've seen you around for quite a while, so I trust your statement on this matter.
Furthermore, even if we removed the typo of "w" that makes the Looney Tunes joke, and properly spell "rabbits", this is arguably relevant to the game thanks to metonymy :
https://www.google.com/search?q=Does+Civ+7+have+rabbits
    "AI Overview Civilization 7 does not feature rabbits as a specific resource or unit. The game includes a variety of different resources, such as Furs and Wild Game, which broadly represent hunting and animal products, but "rabbits" are not listed individually.
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+metonymy
    "metonymy : the substitution of the name of an attribute or adjunct for that of the thing meant, for example suit for business executive, or the track for horse racing."
Towards that end, rabbits and furs should be validly interchangeable within this context.

Being more literate and educated and just NOT a prejudiced ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ like the people who are moderating, is not a socially valid reason for anyone to receive a ban anywhere - especially in a place where your bans in one community affect your standing in other communities.

The social aspect of games is very important to me, and for this reason, how such communities are moderated is very important to me, and for this reason,
I will also be adding 2K to my ignore list.
Kestrel 11 月 4 日 上午 8:52 
This is off-topic but does anyone notice that OP's PFP has a checkerboard pattern on Sonic in the mini version of his avatar, but in his profile pop-up it's normal, wtf
引用自 Kestrel
This is off-topic but does anyone notice that OP's PFP has a checkerboard pattern on Sonic in the mini version of his avatar, but in his profile pop-up it's normal, wtf
I don't have time to grab the video explaining how this works but you can make that happen through the same (or very similar) techniques that can trick an A.I. into thinking that a panda is a gibbon. So, the checkerboard thing wouldn't be an adversarial example generated by a GAN (generative adversarial network) but it's similar.

But yeah, anyone who thinks AI is supposedly infallible should look up GANs
(generative adversarial networks) and learn more about them.
󠀡󠀡 11 月 4 日 上午 9:09 
I read something yesterday about AI generated content being used to charge someone with a crime and if she didn't record her every move on dashcam, the state prosecution would have gotten away with a false felony charge, Colorado, USA.

This should scare everyone. Imagine going to prison for life, or worse, because someone generated AI content of you killing someone that, or more correctly "whom", never existed.
最后由 󠀡󠀡 编辑于; 11 月 4 日 上午 9:12
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 20 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情