安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
155 
举报此帖
Reading, actually reading, is at historically low levels for age groups 5-8 and 8-18. Children of both age groups who reported low levels of enjoyment from reading, still recognized the educational value of it.
Age group 8-18 has largely been raised by social media like Snapchat, Tiktok and Youtube, using ipads and smartphones (A continuing trend in the upbringing of the younger generations) and while 1 in 3 said they enjoyed reading, only 18.7% read daily in their free time, so both age groups are more likely to go on social media (or play video games) than voluntarily picking up a book.
For the age group 5-8, reading has mostly been replaced by animations and social media generated content for younger viewers and audio books.
Both age groups select reading materials that align with their favorite film or tv series, cartoons, comic books, song lyrics, or materials that align with their other personal interests, hobbies and media they already recognize as part of their cultural life or what's popular at the time. And sadly, I highly doubt that many under the age of 20 enjoy reading Goosebumps.