Me, Myself and I

The great thing about OT is that there is no guiding star.
I came for the melting pot soup of chaos and harmony with a twist of lemon and toilet humor.
If someone 'wins', we all lose.

OT ain't a popularity contest.

I simply come here to witness the unhinged topics unwind and to solve the math puzzles that get posted once a day, my vote goes to whoever first responds to this in any way, if you do throw a joke at least tho, lurking notifs is fun

I'm too shy to say (｡>﹏<｡)

i'm nobody

引用自 Corvus XIII：

Who in OT inspires you?
Who in OT makes you rush to it everyday to become en-wizened?
Who would you call your OT Guiding Star?

If it is yourself then put yourself.
The One who gets the most votes, will be known as OT's Guiding Star!
You are only allowed to vote Once.

There's only a select few people on OT that actually seek to do those things that you list. The others are propaganda bots and cultists of either extremist side of the polar political factions

Because they're also allowed to vote too, they'll likely just vote for their relevant cult-leader

If anything, this just models how broken the current two-party-uniparty system is, and why centralist populism needs to be normalised

引用自 Rain't：

引用自 Corvus XIII：

Who in OT inspires you?
Who in OT makes you rush to it everyday to become en-wizened?
Who would you call your OT Guiding Star?

If it is yourself then put yourself.
The One who gets the most votes, will be known as OT's Guiding Star!
You are only allowed to vote Once.

There's only a select few people on OT that actually seek to do those things that you list. The others are propaganda bots and cultists of either extremist side of the polar political factions

Because they're also allowed to vote too, they'll likely just vote for their relevant cult-leader

If anything, this just models how broken the current two-party-uniparty system is, and why centralist populism needs to be normalised

Translation: there are people I agree with here, very wise scholars of knowledge, and the there are people I disagree with who are 100% propaganda bots

引用自 trash nyan：

引用自 Rain't：

There's only a select few people on OT that actually seek to do those things that you list. The others are propaganda bots and cultists of either extremist side of the polar political factions

Because they're also allowed to vote too, they'll likely just vote for their relevant cult-leader

If anything, this just models how broken the current two-party-uniparty system is, and why centralist populism needs to be normalised

Translation: there are people I agree with here, very wise scholars of knowledge, and the there are people I disagree with who are 100% propaganda bots

Which only sounds the way you pose it if you strip all of the context which is OT away

Literal bots or not, they're definitely indoctrinated

You can't reasonably converse with someone who denies math and basic logic. There are still people in today's world that justify the hatred of homosexuals because some people wrote a book about a carpenter who died on wooden sticks after being tortured by Jews

OT is full of a lot of Christian Nationalists, whom I probably disagree with the most

I like pretty much all of the regs, even if I don't always agree with their opinions they are usually funny and interesing. Chuds and libs make OT go round.

引用自 Funky Monk：

Me, Myself and I

Just as well, you appear to be winning.
Everybody else is pro Sigma so far.

引用自 Rain't：

引用自 trash nyan：

Translation: there are people I agree with here, very wise scholars of knowledge, and the there are people I disagree with who are 100% propaganda bots

Which only sounds the way you pose it if you strip all of the context which is OT away

Literal bots or not, they're definitely indoctrinated

You can't reasonably converse with someone who denies math and basic logic. There are still people in today's world that justify the hatred of homosexuals because some people wrote a book about a carpenter who died on wooden sticks after being tortured by Jews

OT is full of a lot of Christian Nationalists, whom I probably disagree with the most

Nah, labelling someone as "indoctrinated" is the same as labelling them as a "bot" if your only reason is "we have different values and life perspectives"

引用自 trash nyan：

引用自 Rain't：

Which only sounds the way you pose it if you strip all of the context which is OT away

Literal bots or not, they're definitely indoctrinated

You can't reasonably converse with someone who denies math and basic logic. There are still people in today's world that justify the hatred of homosexuals because some people wrote a book about a carpenter who died on wooden sticks after being tortured by Jews

OT is full of a lot of Christian Nationalists, whom I probably disagree with the most

Nah, labelling someone as "indoctrinated" is the same as labelling them as a "bot" if your only reason is "we have different values and life perspectives"

I don't know if you're intentionally misunderstanding me or not, because I feel like I'm being crystal-clear

I don't care if someone has different values and life perspectives

I care if someone has illogical and nonsensical values and life perspectives

Denying math and reason aren't the foundation for truth. If you have a valid, logical reason which would justify using religion as a basis for politics, I'm open to hearing it. The issue is that no such reason exists so long as your religion is unfalsifiable. The logic will always be circular, becoming redundant when boiled down to "Because God said so"

引用自 Rain't：

引用自 trash nyan：

Nah, labelling someone as "indoctrinated" is the same as labelling them as a "bot" if your only reason is "we have different values and life perspectives"

I don't know if you're intentionally misunderstanding me or not, because I feel like I'm being crystal-clear

I don't care if someone has different values and life perspectives

I care if someone has illogical and nonsensical values and life perspectives

Denying math and reason aren't the foundation for truth. If you have a valid, logical reason which would justify using religion as a basis for politics, I'm open to hearing it. The issue is that no such reason exists so long as your religion is unfalsifiable. The logic will always be circular, becoming redundant when boiled down to "Because God said so"

And what has this got to do with the current pressing matter of voting for The Guiding Star (other than The Most Famous Guiding Star of course).

Please place your votes.

引用自 Corvus XIII：

引用自 Rain't：

I don't know if you're intentionally misunderstanding me or not, because I feel like I'm being crystal-clear

I don't care if someone has different values and life perspectives

I care if someone has illogical and nonsensical values and life perspectives

Denying math and reason aren't the foundation for truth. If you have a valid, logical reason which would justify using religion as a basis for politics, I'm open to hearing it. The issue is that no such reason exists so long as your religion is unfalsifiable. The logic will always be circular, becoming redundant when boiled down to "Because God said so"

And what has this got to do with the current pressing matter of voting for The Guiding Star (other than The Most Famous Guiding Star of course).

Please place your votes.

May I vote myself again?