安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



HI PUGGLY!!
below that : sex offender/abusive
above that : your the victem.
I am open to refining this more if you have suggestions... but we all know that toddlers and kids do play doctor.. which is fine.. but not if somebody much older does that to them...
similairly preteens will share their first kiss and likely do feel eachother up... which is fine.. but not if older people do it to them..
and teens will sexually experiment.. with is fine but not if older people do it to them
and finally young adults will start to expand that experimentation which is fine but not when much older people do it do them..
the proble is not so much at what age people do something.. but how old the person is they do something with.... which means any set in stone age of consent be in 14, 16, 18 or 21.. will criminalise what is perfecly normal.. and legalise whats abusive..
you telling me trump grabbing an 15yo is a crime but 16yo is legal.. madness but such is the law now.. how is that 16yo in any way his equal.. heck even an 18yo or 21yo would not be..
it all would be exploitive at such an agegap..
Anything lower is wrong.
They claim they have brain damage but wouldn't it take more brain power to actively type that way?