安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
1 
举报此帖
Part of me thinks "This needs some moderation" but another parts likes laughing at all of the oddball basement dwellers posting things which they really shouldn't be sharing with others.
The volunteers usually made decisions that made more sense than the Steam Support mods ...except when that bias crept in, then all rationality kind of went out the window.
Making the case that someone can commit white collar crime against you, so you shouldn't be reckless in the workplace shouldn't result in your precautionary statement getting deleted followed by the volunteer telling the person to waste thousands of dollars on a lawyer, many of whom on the bar association's availability list are in the pocket of big companies anyways, and then have the topic immediately locked. That is completely unreasonable.
Asking how to tell apart threatening sounding people from actual threats and drawing the analogy of king snakes and coral snakes, as a new topic in Off Topic, should not result in a deletion of your created topic and ban for, the topic (not any response) being "off topic" in the sub-forum titled "Off Topic". A volunteer did that to my record and it's been downhill since then.
That is not an unreasonable thing to ask and the only reason to delete it is if you got offended about being a snake.
Would people want me to run the moderation?
It would become very strict as it is the Steam Community Forums and so would always be thinking of the integrity of Valve.
That would have goods and bads.
Let's not forget why they are gone.
They approached Valve with their "concerns". They got invited to a private meeting at Valve HQ. Then made demands. That if not met? They would quit moderating.
This led to them being replaced.
They abused their power to benefit their friends, and silence any (and all) criticism of them. Whether that be their rules, moderation policies, or even personal opinions.
I would much prefer waiting days for someone to be banned over getting banned for saying that "cheaters are bad".
I think it pretty too late for that. The genie is out of the bottle. I would imagine a complete collapse of OT and other forums if politics get banned again. I am sure the leftists would gladly to reinstate the no politics rule so they can exercise echo chamber like in the past.