St✩rlight 님이 먼저 게시:

Disagree because I don't see how you can know that.

I am confused why you don't understand some people do get involved in real violence at times.

I am also confused why you would disagree only on presuming my ignorance. Kind of amused by that one too actually...

St✩rlight 님이 먼저 게시:

Unmade 님이 먼저 게시:

I am confused why you don't understand some people do get involved in real violence at times.

I am also confused why you would disagree only on presuming my ignorance. Kind of amused by that one too actually...

Because you don't know them.

You are now admitting to disagreeing, because you want to disagree with me over some assumed ignorance on my part about online threats, and the usual nature of those who issue them.

There is no way to take this other than as an insult. You need to come off that high horse.

They're doing it on this forum. Post just a minute ago called for "Nuremberg trials for democrats"... Of course they're going to commit violence when called upon by dear leader

Agree. No, i'd rather find a peaceful resolution.

And unlike some confused people who do not understand their own mental health seem think think, words are not violence.

Definitely agree. The people who celebrate political violence are typically hate-filled naive cowards who would never fight for their country or fight hand-to-hand.

It's hard to respect someone who wants to violently censor political voices in a democracy.

kbiz 님이 먼저 게시:

Definitely agree. The people who celebrate political violence are typically hate-filled naive cowards who would never fight for their country or fight hand-to-hand.

It's hard to respect someone who wants to violently censor political voices in a democracy.

A good point on that is how they support the edgiest thing there is to front over the truth of it all. The targeting of both women and children with both rhetoric and directly is usually all the proof I need. I get from time to time a child might, but typically the fringe-left goes at them and women with this 'total war' attitude online with absolutely zero dignity or respect.

Don't get me wrong, this does come from the right as well, there's a fringe of special boys there too, but they are at least policed a lot better internally. A LOT better...

If the left policed their own better, online discourse would have a lot less of this overall problem.

Most of the time people learned violence by examples.

Them have experience of violence. Perhaps it isn't physical but how our brains works mental violence can be more harmful since your body may heal but your soul may not be in it. Our nervesystems are so sensitive to violence that it can stop making bodyparts function who are connected to the nerves.

It's common for soldiers to have bad hearing since the nerves been damaged by intense stress. The nerve damage side effect is bad hearing, bad attention span. Them simply stop being able to to take orders or commands by the nerve damage caused by external violence that them internal shut down. It's less common for physical harm to cause permanent damage on the soul. We may be able to heal your wounds but there is no cure today to stressful events and depressions of violence.

Your brain give warning signal to protect you. It knows that mental harm can be more lethal and permanent than any wound.

Sadly therapy as today has no answer and is about acceptance that biotech today don't have all the answers since violence is external events we don't have control over that some want to open the pandora box, others want people to see what them seen since they're no longer thinking the way you do since there are nerve damages who may never heal.

This is why drugs or narcotics is a society issue as we have accepted narcotics like coffeine or alcohol. Nobody out there telling that coffeine is narcotics and has permanent brain damages on you who has no solution, you may break a bone and it will heal but alcohol and coffee has no cure. Them are permanent brain damaged by consumption of narcotics and we allow it, provide it to our children just like chocolate cigarettes were distributed.

And is it important , the drugs we take are combat drugs. So if you imagine someone affected by combat drugs meant to be the last ride. You may as well realize them may no longer have any morale compass left.

Coffeine used by workers in ww2 to keep them focused during nightshifts, in return unable to focus without the narcotics.

I don't see you. There is no person I text with.

True, but sometimes you just get into a verbal sparring match and get carried away by the gleeful hatred.
I'm sure there is a significant minority of people who will admit to knowing what I mean.

People who issue online threats are idiots. It can be traced. If something happens to the person you have threatened you could be implicated even if you didn't do it. You can not gain anything from making threats, it can only cause hassle.

Unmade 님이 먼저 게시:

They typically tend to be cowards as far away from any real violence as they can get, in my experience.

Anyone reasonable, who has actually been close to any real violence or involved in it somehow, (and I don't mean some slappy-nonsense from grade-school 'violence') understands the hideousness of it, and won't celebrate it or wish it upon anyone, particularly over words or wanting to have a conversation.

Agree or disagree?

I think people are different to one and another and have different triggers to what they do and do not like.

Your question is just based on yourself by looks of it and if others do not agree with you then they are wrong by the way it is put forward.

*
i may have misread is this just about people talking like idiots online then?
if it is just block and ignore.