安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Its just another tool in the toolbox. Its just built differently than all the others. That doesn't make it "bad" or a psyop. I suspect the psyop theory came from the upper management of Microsoft, but we can dive into that another day.
All my old gear becomes my latest Linux workstation once I get some upgrades...
t. Ventured forth into the marvelous world of the "fweedom" after used ZorinOS -- a literal "Windows on linux" distro.
Aside from not letting the NSA watch you masturbate
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010s_global_surveillance_disclosures
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_surveillance
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRISM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ECHELON
The real psyop is trying to dissuade people from using Linux with posts like these
i would find linux maybe more more tempting if hardware level surveillance wasnt a thing ^^
fedora/cent has much more mitigations than microsoft
There are plenty of other companies who make CPUs. There's also plenty of markets which sell modified brand-name CPUs
The people who are mega concerned about stuff like that will be selective about their hardware. I wasn't advocating for plug-and-play systems; I was protesting global surveillance
lets be realistic, you either use Intel or AMD or you sacrifice compatibility even more by using something terrible like ARM which nobody wants to use on their desktop pc.
thus, if you want "uLtImAtE pRiVaCy", switching to linux alone isn't going to do a thing if you're concerned about the nsa.