安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



it's like waving a stick around blindfolded in the dark; you don't know what's going to happen, every time you open your mind to this new information.
it's the only legal way to do many simplistic calculations, and being familiar with the faulty implementations we're legally required to utilize may help you in your life.
for instance calculating grocery store sales rotations and stock investment patterns based on shopping there and tabulating the prices of things over time. you could know when something is probably going to go on sale ahead of time, and when a stock dip is strange or normative.
I was hopeless until I got into fun stuff that's easy to visualize like game theory, geometry, trigonometry and discrete math.
No disrespect to Sir Isaac and Herr Leibniz, but calculus really is useless bollocks.
that's basically outsourcing your life to an algorithm. the main component of scientismist thought.
the algorithm said 'grow, learn math,' so you did and it designed circumstances where you were rewarded mathematically; but where you couldn't calculate or tabulate that this was happening due to your belief in a false set of axioms.
it's the same ignorance of math kicked down the hallway.
the other way lies difference, knowing more, alienation.