所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情
Why corporate bots are a detriment to a fair society.
Corporate bots are designed to control their own corporate narrative or push for profits. But in order for society to thrive, its people must be able to have a voice in the face of both government and corporations. This is not to try and control such entities outright, except for in keeping with a government for the people, as it always should be in that case. This is only to be able to say such things while looking into these corporate sectors and finding a thoroughly cold shoulder as to then say: “Well, at least we had a voice clear of their internalized propaganda. But it looks like we’ll just have to boycott then.” But that’s exactly the kind of general thinking that corporate bots are designed to try and waylay.

I won’t go into my next part because it might not necessarily be open and free to speak in such situations without such fabricated pass-interference of one kind or another.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 24 条留言
Wild Child 10 月 5 日 下午 9:18 
Note that the word 'bot' here is substituted for the word 'employee'.
引用自 Wild Child
Note that the word 'bot' here is substituted for the word 'employee'.
It's speaking for me. Obviously.
Wild Child 10 月 5 日 下午 9:29 
But don't you think using AI to write a piece about why AI is a detriment is a little silly? I mean, I'm assuming you're being serious about the sentiment that AI is dangerous.
引用自 Wild Child
But don't you think using AI to write a piece about why AI is a detriment is a little silly? I mean, I'm assuming you're being serious about the sentiment that AI is dangerous.
Words. Mouth. Inserted. Chill, bro.

Please try reading what I said first then please come back and talk. We're happy to have you!
Wild Child 10 月 5 日 下午 9:38 
What did I misinterpret about it?
It goes without saying that social media algorithms and dark patterns have permanently damaged society, but trying to ban teens from using it will never work.

Anyone who doesn't recognize how harmful it is is already a lost cause. The kindest thing that can be done is lobotomize them into a servile helot class.

"You lack the qualifications to exercise free will."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3wJ_DIBXLuU
最后由 Electric Cupcake 编辑于; 10 月 5 日 下午 9:41
引用自 Wild Child
What did I misinterpret about it?
Exactly. This is why you don’t help to train their anti-consumer algorithms.

(Or at least try not to, lol.)
NadaNewt 10 月 5 日 下午 9:47 
引用自 Electric Cupcake
It goes without saying that social media algorithms and dark patterns have permanently damaged society, but trying to ban teens from using it will never work.

Anyone who doesn't recognize how harmful it is is already a lost cause. The kindest thing that can be done is lobotomize them into a servile helot class.

That 2nd paragraph is a bit concerning, I choose to interpret it as an exercise in freedom of expression and not that you actually think lobotomizing people is a good idea. :6face:
引用自 NadaNewt
引用自 Electric Cupcake
It goes without saying that social media algorithms and dark patterns have permanently damaged society, but trying to ban teens from using it will never work.

Anyone who doesn't recognize how harmful it is is already a lost cause. The kindest thing that can be done is lobotomize them into a servile helot class.

That 2nd paragraph is a bit concerning, I choose to interpret it as an exercise in freedom of expression and not that you actually think lobotomizing people is a good idea. :6face:

Think you so? It's pretty obvious RFK Jr.s aunt would be more qualified for his job than he is.
Wild Child 10 月 5 日 下午 9:51 
引用自 Wild Child
What did I misinterpret about it?
Exactly. This is why you don’t help to train their anti-consumer algorithms.

(Or at least try not to, lol.)
I'll need you to explain for me, if you'd be so kind. I'm at least half your age and I'm assuming this is a reference to something that's beyond my years.
引用自 Wild Child
Exactly. This is why you don’t help to train their anti-consumer algorithms.

(Or at least try not to, lol.)
I'll need you to explain for me, if you'd be so kind. I'm at least half your age and I'm assuming this is a reference to something that's beyond my years.
I'm at least half your age I don't know you sorry.
Wild Child 10 月 5 日 下午 10:05 
引用自 Wild Child
I'll need you to explain for me, if you'd be so kind. I'm at least half your age and I'm assuming this is a reference to something that's beyond my years.
I'm at least half your age I don't know you sorry.
It's a public forum, you have to expect at least a few people you don't know. I mean doesn't it count for something that I'm interested in what you're talking about?
引用自 Wild Child
I'm at least half your age I don't know you sorry.
It's a public forum, you have to expect at least a few people you don't know. I mean doesn't it count for something that I'm interested in what you're talking about?
It's NOT a public forum. It's controlled by the corporation so naturally they have bots to help them control their own personal narrative.

Wouldn't you agree?
最后由 It's A Dev Skill Issue 编辑于; 10 月 5 日 下午 10:17
Wild Child 10 月 5 日 下午 10:19 
引用自 Wild Child
It's a public forum, you have to expect at least a few people you don't know. I mean doesn't it count for something that I'm interested in what you're talking about?
It's a public forum but is it really. I don't think so. It's controlled by the corporation so naturally they have bots to help them control their own personal narrative.

Wouldn't you agree?
Yeah, but I think corporate employees in general are bots. But I say that as someone who has worked with enough corpos to really hate them. But I also think that bots are easy enough to spot. And you can't really converse with them. If you ask them enough questions and they don't like or are not prepared to answer those questions, they tend to break down. And that's true for both actual bots and the programmed people bots. I don't know if there's a definitive solution to them but I do know they're not prepared for unmitigated kindness.
引用自 Wild Child
It's a public forum but is it really. I don't think so. It's controlled by the corporation so naturally they have bots to help them control their own personal narrative.

Wouldn't you agree?
Yeah, but I think corporate employees in general are bots. But I say that as someone who has worked with enough corpos to really hate them. But I also think that bots are easy enough to spot. And you can't really converse with them. If you ask them enough questions and they don't like or are not prepared to answer those questions, they tend to break down. And that's true for both actual bots and the programmed people bots. I don't know if there's a definitive solution to them but I do know they're not prepared for unmitigated kindness.

I should say that only if mickey mouse was made president of all future lunar landings then only then would I feel qualified to say that the Bolshevikes of that past century should qualify for full thrusts beyond the stars.
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条,共 24 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Off Topic > 主题详情
发帖日期: 10 月 5 日 下午 9:14
回复数: 24