Parrots chasing ambulances.

Off Topic discussion forum is going to discuss.

Different reasons it gets posted up, could be
for information,
for debate,
for scaremongering,
for political purpose,
for a fight

You get a mix of people with their motives and it becomes a battle royal.

A lot of people do not want to be wrong so they will dig into their previous stance and keep throwing grenades hoping something will get hit with its shrapnel or blast.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6eSPWaUsgY

They learned it from the president

to call this scavanging is funny considering how easy it is to weaponize against people you dont like, its almost as if the nazis did it too.

It's annoying we need to keep this fun not political go to reddit for that

引用自 My parents are STILL DEAD!!!😭：

It's annoying we need to keep this fun not political go to reddit for that

REDDIT is about to disappear.

This is the sound of opposing echoes entering a chamber. Maybe also the noise of some server processing as well.

引用自 Too many carbs：

引用自 My parents are STILL DEAD!!!😭：

It's annoying we need to keep this fun not political go to reddit for that

REDDIT is about to disappear.

Best short RDDT if you believe that.

引用自 ASKARG：

> A tragic incident or event occurs

> The perpetrator is part of some group wether race, gender, or politically.

> A post talking about the said incident or event gets posted in this forum.

> Most of the thread's replies are overgeneralizations and assumptions of the group that the perpetrator is part of

It is because every event is politicised and people want to get their narrative out ahead. If you don't get your narrative out first, the other narrative (which may be false) wins. A nice example is the guy who shot Kirk, because left wing agitators lied more quickly and more loudly that the shooter was a MAGA supporter than right wingers told the truth, because right wingers were waiting for the truth to be established, most people now think that the shooter was MAGA even though that has been disproved and was disproved almost immediately.

Once people think a thing, they are harder to shake out of the belief even if the belief is untrue. As such you need to get out ahead.

And then you overgeneralize and make assumptions about the people in those threads being "political vultures" so you can feel superior to all of them?

引用自 Gracey Face：

引用自 ASKARG：

> A tragic incident or event occurs

> The perpetrator is part of some group wether race, gender, or politically.

> A post talking about the said incident or event gets posted in this forum.

> Most of the thread's replies are overgeneralizations and assumptions of the group that the perpetrator is part of

It is because every event is politicised and people want to get their narrative out ahead. If you don't get your narrative out first, the other narrative (which may be false) wins. A nice example is the guy who shot Kirk, because left wing agitators lied more quickly and more loudly that the shooter was a MAGA supporter than right wingers told the truth, because right wingers were waiting for the truth to be established,

most people now think that the shooter was MAGA even though that has been disproved and was disproved almost immediately.

Once people think a thing, they are harder to shake out of the belief even if the belief is untrue. As such you need to get out ahead.

The instant the shooting happened you had democrats condemning it and saying we need to find out what the motive was and republicans, especially Trump, went on unhinged rants about the scourge of 'leftist democrat violence'...

The right wing did not wait at all.

引用自 sfnhltb：

And then you overgeneralize and make assumptions about the people in those threads being "political vultures" so you can feel superior to all of them?

Of course not. Only the ones that fit the description.

Its just politics.
Working as intended.