安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Hence the difference in punishment.
What is legally defined as a 'child' is also something the courts can address on a per-case basis.
the alternative is executing them, but only if they're below a certain age.
You'll find that's all of them.
They should be thoroughly examined and treated with some sort of therapy, in hopes to find out what is wrong with their deranged mentality and what the root cause was, and possibly find a solution so that it can be prevented from happening again to them or another youth.
There are solutions to nearly everything..... usually.
Kids? Depends on the age and circumstances, IMO.
so we should look for the emotionless benefit to the situation, as this killer most likely did, and use them in inhumane medical experimentation.
i guess when the state uses people's lives for its own purposes its okay, but when citizens do it ... ?