安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



-----
In the middle of said article the main pull quote seems to be some definitional quibble over the use of 'some' vs 'many'. The stuff that brings migraines to non-lawyers.
Having around 20 to 30 troops instead of 115 shows restraint and a proportional response I guess... but this doesn't seem to be a sticking point, just that it wasn't ever 115 in Portland. Given that this doesn't seem to show any heavy handedness by the administration(they could have sent much more than 115) I don't see what the deal is.
Also there's so many stays and counterstays with different due dates I can't really follow if there is a current stay and when it ends. If there's no current stay order the guards could go in right now. This article is a little muddy on whats currently in effect.
Yes, however it doesn't show a drastic emergency requiring the national guard to be mobilized. When you claim you had to deploy 115 troops to keep the peace and later it comes out you actually only had to deploy 25% of that number it doesn't look good.
Thats why it was unanimously rejected by his own judges once they realized the government submitted false claims as their justification.
This should be a direct link to the article from the original source:
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/material-factual-error-9th-circuit-reverses-victory-for-trump-admin-in-national-guard-case-after-discovery-shows-feds-lied-about-troop-numbers-in-oregon/
Actually fun fact, the administration has been repeatedly caught using footage from the 2020 George Floyd riot and claiming it was ICE protesters.
Corruption wasn't really a problem nor was it popular to condemn it until le peach man took over.
Tends to happen when you turn the dial to 11 and then break it.
Could be considered contempt of court to knowingly present false evidence.
I mean lawyers have been stripped of their right to practice law for less, and they could face jail time for making false statements.
I mean don't be surprised to see this case be used to challenge any claim the government makes that isn't backed up by evidence now. The courts typically would trust the word of the Government, but that is happening less and less as they keep catching them lying.