安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



For everyone that has like a free hour of reading :
www.youtube.com/@nowthisimpact/posts
Don't forget to fact check them ! :p
The bill needs 60 votes to pass. Republicans do need some Dem votes to get it through, but they also don't want to support healthcare (under the lie of Dems wanting to spend millions in taxpayer dollars on illegals).
Anyhow, i'd wager he waits for "emergency powers" to get full steam ahead, and he'll get those after something drastic happens in the streets. Shame is, the "no kings" protests were all peacefull, and the only ones with guns were Republicans.
But if you read the "now this impact", you'll get that Trump anted the I.C.E. gun fund by 700%, for getting them explosives ordinance. I didn't found anything about the claim of "chemical ammo", so i'd guess it's just tear gas and the "impact" is overdramatising.
And nope, and nope. The protests weren't all peaceful. People who live around those places know. Never trust media because media from any side is gonna be biased. I'd like to see them condem the BLM riots, but I know they don't. These people don't care about being peaceful, they only care about virtue signalling. If in 2025 that means acting mentally ill in a blow-up childish (oddly pdf-ish) animal, so be it. They are still there to disrupt, but authorities know that trying to win against an idiotic child usually doesn't work because an idiot cannot be reasoned with logic and don't respect borders. If they aren't being arrested, there's nothing that can stop them acting like antisocial toddlers. And they know this so they take advantage of it.
If you don't want ICE to be more funded, perhaps don't get in their face.
Under the lie? The only lie I've been hearing is for years democrats claiming they weren't giving healthcare to illegals. And they were. Tell me, do you agree, or disagree if I said people in the US illegally should not be eligible for any entitlement programs at all?