安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



they *may* point in a general directiom but cant be used to guage 100pc certainty.
People are infinitely more compkex than just one statistic.
If you're on the fence, you can try a journalist review, but only if you're on the fence and want to find specific info. These people will downplay the downsides, so if they say (for example) "it gets a little grindy", you know that means you will spend your life grinding. But they at least know how to explain what they did or didn't like and why it matters.
But the only way to make sure you get games you will like is to know what you like. It's not rocket science. If the game looks interesting, and you can pinpoint specific reasons why, give it a try.