安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I think an ICE raid would fall under such a thing.
Oh no, heavily biased lying media is gonna have a harder time telling their lies
Just like lefties for the past decade or so I don't give a ♥♥♥♥♥♥
Regarding press passes for the Pentagon, members of the government have the freedom not to talk to the press, and oftentimes are required not to do so if the information is classified. Although the first amendment is phrased in absolutist language, the courts have long ruled that national security is an overriding factor that meets the standards for strict scrutiny.
So nothing particularly unusual seems to be going on here.
/thread
have a nice day
You should hear what Woodrow Wilson did.
*Iran
*Venezuelan drug cartels and Government.
*Hamas - potentially and sooner rather than later.