安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



? the better and more skilled I get will still lead me to playing just as skilled players leading to all the same problems ive stated.
Please stop trolling, find something more useful to do with yourself. THANKS!!!!!!
Save for arbitrary matchmaking wherein the algorithm for determination of it is simply never publicly revealed.
I really don't get the point you are even trying to make. You don't like it that playing a game at a higher-level matches you into lobbies with other higher-level people where you are challenged? It should feel BETTER to overcome other skilled players instead of running around effortlessly slaughtering new players like Anakin in the jedi temple.
If you really want to decimate newbs you could always make a smurf account.
irl you have different sport leagues for a reason too..
the worst of the 1st league is about equal in ability as the best of the 2d league (thats why the worst 2 of the 1st and the best 2 of the 2d battle it out to see who will go next season 1st and 2d..
similair cutoffs you see in all sports, before you ever get to participate in the olympics you need to win a lot of qualification matches and so do those around you making the average level of your competetors ever more stuff..
first being the best of your club, than being the best of your region, than being best of your province, than best of your nation, than best of europe than in to of world.. and eventually you could get the 1 or 1 of the few entry tickets your nation gets for that sport.
ofcourse if there if it's just the best 1 or the best few that go up to the next level.. differs per sport and often is based on past performance of your club/region/nation in that sport.. if you happen to be good in a sport in a nation where few others ever were your chances to participate being the 2d best of that nation may be zero while lesser atletes from a nation that historicly won more in that sport do get to participate.
but the basic idea sticks.. strong fight strong.. weak fight weak.
but the prizes and fame also increase..
being the worst of a top 100 globally players in a game competion still has more fame than being the winner of your local regional server.
so matchups with players in your own powerlevel for ranked matches is only fair..
what can be said thats wrong.. is the way "elo" works.
in football a win is always 3 poins and a equal 1 point.
it does not matter who the opponent is.
in elo.. if a team ranked 1st in a competion with 30 points out of last 10 matches.. would play against one ranked last.. 1 point out of last 10 matches..
than with elo.. that higher ranked team could only gain 0.1 point if they won. but stands to loose 3 points if they loose...
-such a system makes an underdog wins overrepresented in elo score, and an stronger players losses drop it to much.
a better way to represent your performance/skill than elo is needed.. but pairing people of equal ability to eachother.. is only fair.
.. Was supposed to, at least, until some have had the idea that using the system to their advantages would help them to avoid it more or less entirely.
The feature doesn't take into account your mindset, but the way you perform, and that's about it.
Not when, not really against whom, and definitely not under which conditions you've performed so well, and those are the major flaws.
Everybody's got some good and bad days, so performing extraordinarily well once in a doesn't reflect the skill of the player, but does shine some light on the player's possible potential if they were to get serious and invest some time to improve playing the game.. Which is mostly never gonna happen anyway, as nobody's got the time for that because most people aren't being paid for playing videogames.
So, the system does help when it comes to the competitiveness of the game, but that's about it.
It doesn't care about the players who don't treat it seriously, but do play fairly decently for whatever reason.. Forcing them against players who do take it seriously, and due to the difference within the present mindsets and gameplay styles, one side will win, and that's it.
In most cases, the difference within the mindsets can play such a big role that one side is far too many times restricted from learning a thing or two from the better players.. Either because they don't care, but mostly due to the fact that the gameplay of the competitive player is far too advanced for them to understand and attempt to try on their own.
yes what can happen is that basicly a person with some natural talent joins his local amateur league 5 club....
and at age 4 is already the talent of the club.. scouted away by a better club at age 6.. and so on... a rise to fame.. at 12 they are scouted to join a youth training school in one of the top teams of their nation..
but than they hit a point where their talent leveled.. and basicly now they are stuck loosing a lot of matches.. plkaying for a 2d league team, as a minor player...
they miss the days when they were the star of the team..
what such players basicly say.. just cause I won a competition/was the best of my club does not mean I should be FORCED to take the promotion to a higher league.
all clubs/atheles are allowed to say NO to a promotion/scouting attempt they qualify for.
they like the feeling of being in their local amateur team.. more than being a lower league professional player.
and well to that sentiment I got to say.. that should be allowed.. just like atletes irl.. the fact you QUALIFY for that olympic ticket/higher league.. does not mean you HAVE to take it.
ofcourse a higher league often means much higher pay which is why you want it...
but elo does not do that.
say with elo you win 10% of your opponents elo if you win.
and you cannot play against people that are upto 10x stronger or upto 10x weaker.
so starting at 1000
you could be playing against people with 100 elo or 10000 elo.
if you win your first match against a 10000 elo player you would imediatly rise to 2000 elo..
you would than need to loose your next 7 matches.. just to fall back to your old ranking...
if you loose from an 100 elo person.. you would drop to 900 and they would rise to
200.. you would need to win 10 matches vs every 1 you loose against such players just to stay same elo.
with tighter gaps of just 1% more or less this becomes less an issue.. but than the chance for a matchup becomes less.. so waiting ques become much worse.
less players will be at the top so the gaps increase usually to satisfy those higher ranked players...
this leads to it basicly becoming a grind to kill lower elo ones to loose it all again with 1 loose vs a strong player.. stagnant despite winning most.. feels no fun.
a better way to do this :
have all players join in say the iron league.. as they start.
each win gives 1 iron badge.. looses and equals not count.
this gives a league ranking
the league above the copper league, will do a similair thing but with copper badges.
than at the end of each week.. the 10% best of each league move a league up... the 10% worst drop a legua..
if you don't play a week than you will thus also drop a legue..
that system will be more fair than an arbitrairy elo ranking.
make competitions... every new player starts in the bottom tier.. randomly tossed in a periodic competion with x other players...