安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
22 
举报此帖
7800x3d can draw upto 162w by default
7+ phases with cooling to the cpu should be enough
8+1+1 would be the minimum
as long as the board has 10+ chokes around the cpu it should be fine for cpu power atleast
(count the bricks around the cpu socket, and make sure there are heatsinks near all of them)
other features like pci-e 5.0 and more lanes to nvme and other slots are all up to your needs
there is no 'best' all would be cpu limited, but bottom or lower end boards will nerf its performance
Asrock issue might just be defective cpus put into mainboards that push the cpu a bit more to cause failures. Asus might be the same but to a much lesser extent. Asus also gets usb overvoltage stuff more often than other mainboards in my opinion.
Buying mainboards is a pain and frustrating. Go to amazon US region, pcpartpicker, new egg, etc... and read reviews. Compare 1+2 star reviews vs the 4+5 star reviews. Read recent reviews since products change over time. Read reviews to see if they are nonsense and to look for defect trends.
You can look up some mainboard performance reviews on youtube. Hardware unboxed has some.
Avoid buying high end, low end or uncommon mainboards. Go with the herd and look at reviews for the common mainboards.
No matter what mainboard you get you play the silicon lottery you just try to change the odds to your favour. If the mainboard boots up then you cleared a big step. If it lasts a couple weeks or a few months then you've cleared another step.
One of my friends uses an ASUS mobo too and he had no issues so far, another is using an MSI and he didn't have any issues either (although his BIOS/UEFI isn't anywhere near as good when it comes to features as the two ROG boards I have last worked with).
I guess MSI is better value for money (I recently thought my mobo was damaged, and ordered a new one expecting similar levels of connectivity etc.. but didn't want to spend a fortune on replacing an AM4 board given that the other parts are all used/aging. I ended up ordering an MSI board, but fortunately found out my old one is fine while I waited for delivery, so I returned the new one).
I once had an issue with a broken ASUS AIO watercooler (the cooler itself worked, but the "bells & whistles" - the screen etc. - were defective), and the ASUS service center took plenty of time to help with diagnosis and then refunded the purchase without any hassle (I just sent it to them and they refunded). So I really can't complain about their service - maybe my tendency to register all purchases with the manufacturers helped, as this enabled them to see I'm a returning / loyal customer.
I guess when it comes to value for money, MSI will give you a better equipped mainboard for the same price. If you're the type of person who doesn't want to play with detailed settings, MSI seems the better deal. If you want a "tweaker's board", ASUS is worth the money (in my experience - though maybe higher end MSI boards have better BIOSes than the one I saw).
No idea about Gigabyte - never used any of their products, so can't tell how good they are (although I heard some of their products are quite good).
Since you already have some ASUS/ROG parts, if they're still under warranty, I'd say register them (even if not recently purchased) and go for an ROG board if price isn't a limiting factor (that way you can tell the service team you're a loyal customer if anything happens, and they'll be able to see that). If value for money is a major consideration, see which board has all the connectivity you want in sufficient numbers, and maybe look through the negative reviews to see how reasonable they are.
Bad user reviews can often be the result of unreasonable user expectations or user mistakes - a mobile AC unit I have had multiple bad reviews back when I got it (it still works perfectly after years of good service, even though at it's age I wouldn't blame it for failing), and some of the negative reviews clearly indicated that the users hadn't used the device properly (it's one of those devices with a "hose", where you need to put a plastic sheet around the window with an opening for the hose so the device can depressurize the room and remove the warm air). The average was severely impacted by those bad reviews, and most of them were down to people not knowing how to use that type of device, and not bothering to read the manual (which clearly explained how to use it, and what is necessary to do so). I'm glad I didn't listen to them.