安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
22 
举报此帖
£250 more expensive though 😨
Is it an option, just pointing out that it's hella expensive.
The 9070XT is the best gpu "fps per dollar/euro/pound", but nvidia is more future proof in my opinion with the technologies.
And the 5080.. +250 pounds for 15-20fps is a big no for me.
5070 vs 5070 Ti
5070 Ti vs 5080
So yes if money is your issue compare them out and see. There are plenty of good benchmark comparisons
Also think about your Case and PSU as you will need considerable more space for a 5080 as well as higher wattage PSU most likely and you will want a modern ATX 3.x PSU as well
Do you mind elaborating?
I’m just curious about your reasons regarding frame gen.
I really dont know the hate towards FG, i would understand the hate if it was towards the developers not optimizing their games, making it mandatory to use FG but other than that.. I use it in a couple games and i really dont see any artifacts or input lag.. I guess a lot of people is using FG with lower framerate base than 60, that way you could feel input lag i think.
Unless you want to try SteamOS/Bazzite/Linux then a 9070XT is a better pick.
Yeah, people repeat whatever some YouTuber said or what they saw someone else post in a thread and half of them don’t even know what FG actually does. They keep mixing it up with upscaling tech and then you get clueless oneliners like “NO FAKE FRAMES” which just spreads more confusion. Other people read that and take it as fact.
It’s funny how FSR, which looks horrible and literally messes with the resolution, is somehow totally fine, but frame gen which doesn't do anything to the quality but boosts your FPS x2?
NO SIR, not on my watch. ^^
For me personally, FG works great even below 60 FPS (I’d say 45–50 FPS is the limit). I don’t get noticeable artifacts and input lag is basically nonexistent, exactly like you said, the only time people complain is when they’re trying to use it with a super low base framerate or if their GPU doesn't support it. That’s kind of on them.
I was already using AFMF years ago on my old 6800XT&7900XTX and even that worked surprisingly well but after switching to NVIDIA, their Frame Gen implementation is even smoother. Literally free extra performance with zero downsides for my use case. No lag, no real visual issues just double the FPS.
IMO it’s one of the best technical features we’ve gotten in years. A legit game changer.
edit:
This also doesn't make any sense.....
Frame gen creates noticeable input lag. It's minor but I know when it's enabled and I'm not a fan of it.
Nope, not really, at least not noticeably. That might’ve been true a few years back when Frame Gen first came out, but nowadays NVIDIA uses Low Latency Mode to keep input lag negligible. AMD’s implementation of AntiLag does the same on their side.
Is this your take or have you read this somewhere and now you are replicating it? If not, which GPU and which settings did you use?
Btw, this statement is also flawed.
FSR and DLSS are both upscaling technologies, the difference in FPS is not inherent to the GPU alone and this statement doesn’t really make senseComparing them as if one automatically produces more frames than the other ignores how each game, resolution, and GPU workload interacts with the respective upscaler.
Bro you are talking so much crap.
I have tested frame gen recently and in faced paced games it creates input lag for me, and for me it is noticeable.
Secondly DLSS undoubtably gives more fps than FSR, stop talking nonsense.
First off, yes, you notice input lag, subjective experience acknowledged. That doesn’t mean Frame Gen automatically introduces lag for everyone. It’s literally been tested in multiple benchmarks depending on FPS, game type, and hardware, it can be barely noticeable which it is most of the time. Your personal anecdote isn’t universal proof.
Second, DLSS and FSR are both upscaling technologies. Saying "DLSS gives more FPS than FSR" as a blanket statement MAKES ZERO sense. Output FPS depends on the game, resolution, settings, and GPU workload. You’re parroting stuff you heard somewhere without understanding what these tools actually do.
Also, you still haven’t told us which GPU you were actually using when you noticed this so called "input lag". I mean, you’re supposedly leaning towards a 5070 or 5070 Ti, so what’s your current GPU with which you “tested” this? Curious to know, because that context actually matters.
So yeah, before calling other people nonsense maybe check what you’re talking about. Otherwise, you just look like someone repeating YouTube opinions without context. ^^