安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



my idea.
for 16k+ maxed visuals, 5090 is not enough
4060 is close to a 9060xt
could be a little weak for 1440p60 gaming
4070/ti or 5070 would be a better target for higher fps at 1440p 100+hz gaming
https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-4070-vs-Radeon-RX-9060-XT
my opinion.
gpu drawing at 4k+ then scaling down is more work than using native 1440p or 1080p res
a 5090 could be pegged at 100% usage doing that even with a single 1080p display and not be cpu bound
Joking, but really any new 50 series will push that CPU, some new games will just push it regardless of GPU, 5060 Ti would be fine but you could go higher and drop a 5800X in if your motherboard allows it, you can find them dirty cheap now.
my zotac 5070 is about 600 USD and was worth every cent even with the bottleneck, running games like arc raiders (yet again, even with the 3600) at 300 fps with framegen all ultra
gddr7 is also extremely worth it