安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
23 
举报此帖
For cards that saw big performance leaps, the 980/ti, 1080/ti were impressive, the 2080ti brought a whole new way of doing things with Ray tracing and dlss which are arguably the largest upgrades and development in gpu / gaming tech for many, many years.
The rest only really make an argument based on individual perceived value versus doing something actually impressive.
And struggles with games like Red Dead 1 and 2
Put that in your parents PC and get a real GPU. Even RTX 4060 or 5060 of any kind would be a huge step up. And rather cheap too.
Which barely works on any apps or services most people use. I've tried it on any major app and website it doesn't even do anything
It's worked on everything I've used it on while viewing on an 86 (now 85) inch screen, it can be subtle but it's there and nice with older movies.
You try it on things like YouTube or VLC Media Player it just says NOT ACTIVE
And if you can barely see a difference on an 85 inch screen, then that right there proves my point of just how useless it is when most people are using sub 40 inch screens or using a 15 inch laptop or a 24 inch Monitor.
A nice 4K TV should have enough of a built in digital filter / upscaler to make 480p DVD rips look better then without any digital enhancements that would render the RTX video enhancement even more pointless
I think that a good GPU is the one that lasts long and has no major issues. Apart from that, the best is always going to be the most powerful one. But everyone buys what they can or want. I'm really happy with my 5060 ATM.
It depends on the film / movie but I use it with Netflix, amazon prime, now TV, Disney and various not so legal places to watch shoes and movies and I've never had it say it doss t work.
Size doesn't equate to much IMO. Mostly it's only noticeable when factoring distance to the screen. A 32" screen can have the exact same perceived quality (and I say perceived because everything is subjective) to an 85" screen. Distance will be the key factor to differentiate between both. In fact, too big a screen at not enough distance is actually a waste of money and a strain on the eyes, just like a too small screen too far away.
Now, picture "quality" is independent from size, even if we are talking about the same resolutions like 1080p or 4K. That is why some TV cost 5 or 10x more than others for the same size/resolution. Even things like lighting capabilities and the level of "black" a TV has.
Last of the top gpus that used the normal 250w and before nvidea started slacking.