安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



You clearly have no idea what goes into such a revision. YES it would cost more because that would not only require a full mother board revision with more R&D time but also require a motherboard chipset added as they are maxing out the I/O die currently.
Also using a Mac as a server is the biggest waste of money I have heard of in recent history.
Valve wants to sell games and not hardware. They are already concerned that some small companies may buy Steam Machines for their offices where no Steam Games would be purchased.
When the machine will be out, more PC builders will likely give you an option for pre-installed SteamOS instead of Windows. With thunderbolt port if you wish.
That would be good.
Computers are getting smaller and smaller and more compact, between AMD's onboard graphics continuing to push boundaries, and with RISC-V coming into use and threatening to completely replace ARM. I imagine small single-board systems and small cube PCs with optional eGPU enclosures will become more popular in the future.
I've always preferred Mid-tower cases at the largest, but GPUs and CPU coolers are just too damn big, now.
EDIT: Also, from the specs provided to the media that attended the hardware event they noted the USB-C port on the Steam Machine as being USB-C 3.2 Gen2 which is 10Gbps, not 20Gbps. USB-C 3.2 Gen2x2 is 20Gbps and I've not seen any media outlet that attended and reported on specs denote the USB-C port for the Steam Machine being USB-C 3.2 Gen2x2.