安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



When you look at the savings over the life of the card, it's just not worth it for a worse experience overall.
Yes, but what I'm really asking is whether the GSync actually matters that much. I suppose I could try disabling it and see how much difference it makes.
If that bothers you or not is a question only you can answer.
Personally, VRR is a must with todays games with how uneven their performance can be.
I tend to lock FPS around the lower points for smooth frame times, but I have a much beefier GPU so my low points are still high.
It's really not a marketing gimmick, there are very few reasons to buy an AND gpu over an nvidia one right now, frankly, you have to be a real fanboy to do so.
The savings are not enough over the life of the card to give up the superior tech, thst the OP has a gsync monitor gives him even less reason to go AMD.
Edited, I accidentally deleted an important part of a line.