安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



The Linux community has had 20+ years and barely made any progress. The average PC Gamer or consumer sees this alternative as a complete joke. You are definitely not winning over any real content creators or people who game for a money-making living
If we look CPUs just by ISA then let's return the VLIW?
The number of users of Linux is increasing day by day, and the 32-bit version has already demonstrated good performance with native Windows applications, including games. The question to be asked is whether Windows is actually using 64-bit or not, especially in games. Steam now thinks in terms of Linux not only for its operating system but also for running anything associated with it. In reality, those who use Steam are not actually using Windows :).
And China wins with a system with 128-bit...
No no no, long live the public release of Windows 10 source code.
Barely made any progress?
See this is why boomers stuck in the past should reflect before posting.
Just the work that Valve together with the WINE team has done to get Proton and linux gaming in the amazing state that it is today (together with steam os development which directly benefited other linux distro's) is nothing short of amazing.