安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



Here is one of the most inefficient GPUs on the market.
7900XTX - 9W
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3495761860
That depends. It may be inefficient under load, but still very efficient at idle, or the other way around.
There are plenty of benchmarks about the under load power consumption of various cards, but hardly ever a peep about idle. Disappointing, since idle is the floor below which you will never go, even if you're hardly using your system. It's going to be there any time your computer is powered on.
That's why I want to see discussion of idle power draw be drawn more into the mainstream, and that's what I'm trying to accomplish with this thread. Help fill the information gap, for those that care about it at least.
9W is actually excellent and I thank you for your participation.
This 9W is misleading because it only happens if I have everything closed and don’t move my mouse. Just touching my mouse spikes it to 30W. Browsing Internet is like 50W.
I also dislike how it scales in games. Full load is like 380W but I need to drop below 60% utilisation to see any difference. It does drop to 180W if I cap fps but ultra old games still draw well over 100W.
I’m happy with the GPU but efficiency is not its strength.
I can get it down to 18W if I turn everything down.
*I have MSI afterburner with fans set to a custom curve. minimum of 40% speed no matter temps, and ramp to 100% at 45C.
That's what mine says looking in the Nvidia app.
16W idle with 2 monitors
2560x1440 240Hz & 2560x1440 144Hz