安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
switch it on= (clear to understand)
a gpu can only be destructed, maybe hit it with a hammer really fast, by violence and hot temperature. thats mainly it!!
A badly cooled GPU that is running constantly at or above it's max safe temperature could cause issues though later down the line, but this has nothing to do with raytracing in itself.
thx for reading.
I'm genuinely sorry. It's no wonder amd gpu market share is in single digits.
OP said 1080p, not 4k.
Looking at the Tom's Hardware GPU rankings, the 9070 (at 1080p Ultra) is at just under 100fps in their Ray Tracing test battery. A few frames below the 7900xtx, and level with the 5070/4070 super. 1440 ultra, it's still around 65 fps. 4k is only like 38. But so is the 5070. Neither of them are 4k RT cards.
This is without DLSS/FSR/XESS.
While rtx 5070ti is 850$
While rx 9070 was 600$ and xt is 700$
The extra vram are worth it
These prices where i live