安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



https://www.hardware-corner.net/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/msi-afterburner-power-limit-screen.jpg
Cards don't lose as much performance as you would first think by limiting it to 80, 70, even 60%, as the higher a chip clocks, the more power it draws. At its highest clock speeds, it's the least efficient by a mile -- a big chunk of Watts (and extra heat) for a few extra percentages in performance. But as hardware is sold and competing on performance, manufacturers would be stupid to not push for it at factory settings.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-UxmcEeRiA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U84nKlF20Iw&
Undervolting can be done as well via Afterburner. Here you can keep the performance and only drop power draw and heat (and fan noise). Just watch a guide on that.
probably doable with 4090 and 5090
and still beats what AMD has to offer