安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



I don't think that would be a great idea tho.
https://www.cpuagent.com/cpu/intel-core-i5-9400f/bottleneck/nvidia-geforce-rtx-4060
But if OP want the best bang for buck, save up to replace whole system, and get what best at the time with the money saved up at the said time.
Sure, a better CPU does have a very signficant impact on FPS, but if you play on a 1080p screen, the RTX 3060 or 4060, with an i5-9400F, will give you well above 60 FPS for almost all games (except some badly designed ones like Starfield, sigh).
Hey, isn't both RTX 3000 and 4000 series share all the recent features?
Edit: Also, I would assume it will be a lot cheaper to get a 3060 too, since it would get sort of a decent sale compared to the 4060.
And yes it should be cheaper than 40 series.
3060 is an entry level grade gpu for gaming
3060ti and 4060 are stronger even with less vram
system ram speed will make little difference
The data is correct but can be misleading.
It’s 1080p in old games. At 1440p and/or newer games the 4060 will be the bottleneck.
This CPU can still provide 60-120fps in many games.
Have a nice day!