安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
62 
举报此帖
Just a few of the issues.
1. Steam has no way to know how the game will run, games can run well even if some of your hardware is under spec, or not run well even if you have stronger hardware.
2. The concept of "running well" is so ambigious everyone will have different ideas of what it means. Not to mention it greatly depends on the game settings
3. Steam can't test every combination to verify, so if steam tells you a game will run well and it doesn't well that makes them liable.
4. Likewise if steam tells you a game won't run well and it does that makes steam liable as well.
5. Most users don't want steam saving their computer specs or having access to that data.
etc
But, easier said than done. And lots of reasons why it hasn't been, at least not satisfactorily.
If Valve acted on, filtered or rated a game based on given hardware, Valve could be held liable for false advertisement to the customer. While there is the option for refunds, Valve would have to be much more lenient with how frequent they tolerate returned games due to unsatisfied hardware requirements that were inaccurately represented, be it through misjudgment by the developer and/or publisher, misconfigured hardware settings, drivers, combination of software on the operating system or other variable factors that lead to exotic outliers.
Liability, to the developer and/or pubisher:
If Valve acted on, filtered or rated a game based on given hardware, Valve could be held liable for missed sales to the developer and/or publisher for misrepresenting a product during the opportunity of its sale towards certain customers due to inaccurate evaluation by underestimation of a system's power relative to the given hardware requirements, be it through misjudgment of benchmark results by misconfigured hardware settings, drivers, combination of software on the operating system or other variable factors that lead to exotic outliers.
The system requirement info fields are form free text fields instead of static fields in which to add or select hardware components from.
Valve would have to have a perfectly written and ranked database in which components are compared and benchmarked, something no vendor, not even specialized sites that benchmark hardware, can provide accurately due to exotic outliers.
No, Valve wouldn't do that.