安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
5 
举报此帖
The meaning of MULTIPLE is consisting of, including, or involving more than one.
Does not change my argument the the "multiple forum bans" should be 4 not 2.
Technically 2 is multiple but if you say multiple most people are not going to think a couple.
That's the literal definition. It's not my fault people can't look it up.
Ya I use that same jive when some one uses a term out side it's "literal" definition. Seems the presumed definition carries more weight the the actual definition. None the less does not change my argument.
"Seriously it makes it too easy for some one with an ax to grind to check posts in other forums to find older posts to report, that no one in said forum saw fit to report, just to give you an automatic month off."
But hun, if you want to continue to argue I'm you huckleberry.
This is after the person has already received enough warnings to warrant a ban. If someone can't be bothered to follow the rules of a business, the business isn't required to be bothered to host them.
Edit: wait, you have EIGHTEEN forum bans? you do know that most people on the platform have zero, right?
Lol, Everybody in here is innocent. Didn't you know that? Lol....
Which means they are unaware of the issues in the system.
Take in to account I've been online longer then MMOs.
Correction, a pair.
At a certain point, it stops being "maybe they'll learn from the consequences of their actions this time" and becomes "we need to stop the person who is breaking the rules from continuing to break the rules"
Try harder or have this keep happening.
But you admit the violation, and exactly what aspect of the TOS did you break if it wasn't the one you were reported for?
I've been on the platform twice as long as yourself and have not had a single ban/ timeout.
It's not what the posters were reported for but that they only got reported because they hurt some ones fells not because of the violation. That is my main issue with the flag system.
I didn't say this platform, I said online, back when it was pretty much just forums. Back when online gaming was fan sites for single player games and LAN. I didn't get here till comparatively late in my online gaming life. Figure, what 30 some odd years?
And I can't think of much else to say about the "never got a time out" that wouldn't be condescending. I'm sorry, to me that is no sort of flex.
Yes, I have been online longer then some that are reading this now.
Moderation isn't in the hands of people in the standard user group, all they can do is report something, like most places. The Moderation/Support teams, or Developer/Hub moderator teams determine if the report is actionable or not.
Typically I see violations get flagged and removed rather quickly like spam, begging threads, advertising, trolling/nuisance behavior etc. Very few abuse the feature, and I have seen a troublemaker eat a ban for abusing it before.
The basic phrase here is "It's what you say and how you say it" that can be the difference in getting moderated, and nothing happening by being civil.
18 is already a considerable amount, they do stack and can also trigger automated restrictions if getting hit in game hubs. Generally, avoiding what got the 18 is the way to avoid it increasing.
TBH it's likely someone happened to be looking for an answer to something or for a particular subject/game otherwise ended up there, didn't see the date, and reported it. Doubt anyone went out of their way to look for a violation from whenever in the past.
That said I am biased as I always follow the rules. As you will see in this thread, it is very easy to cheerlead this sort of thing when it happens to other people. Calling someone a liar in two different boards, obviously against the rules and obviously always deserving of a ban, is still probably not a crime deserving of punitive and arbitrary lockout of the Steam client
But again I do find it very satisfying to see happen to others.
Honestly, it is even a little silly to consider given how often you yourself have wanted to see more severe and demanding bans. What did you think that involved?