We're seeing a rash of false AI-usage accusations by players against developers in their game reviews. This seems to be an attempt at extortion. It's like mafia street thugs demanding protection money against fake accusation review bombing which damages Developers' revenue streams and reputations.

These are actual harms to the Developer and maybe even fellow players if they're missing out on a great game based on lies. The reviewers know this. That is their intent. They even have bots hopping in their comments to pile on, thank the reviewer and claim they're not buying the game because of that review and those accusations. That would sound like damages if it were real and not staged to support a narrative.

I think Steam ought to include in the Community Standards and Rules that any accusations of undisclosed AI-generated content need to be made privately in formal complaints with Steam and supported by evidence or expert analysis (not pseudo analysis and amateur impressions).

There needs to be a proper investigation and fair adjudication, with opportunity to appeal/respond before irreparable harm is inflicted with mere "suspicions", "feelings" and "impressions".

Anyone who publicly makes an accusation using the review tools needs to at a minimum have their bogus review removed, or even see their account suspended from posting reviews for a while if the violation is agregious.

This harmful behavior needs to be nipped in the bud before it gets out of control and ruins the shopping experience for everyone when nearly every game is review bombed with libelous, unsupported claims.