安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



Any further form of automation would mean that people begin to hoard downloads again.
It's literally the same amount of data size and bandwidth, just not at the same time. Makes no difference as far as I understand how things work.
The simple thing is, by making it inconvenient to download everything out of the algorithmic schedule, less people will actually attempt downloading everything in short order and therefore less bandwidth capacity is needed to cover the overall needs.
Seems like they got away with that one nonetheless...
They made changes instead of auto updating all, they space it out to queue, and schedule, with the queue being games you recently, or frequently been playing, and for scheduling being games haven't played within x amount of days.
You can turn off both autoplay videos and livestreams.
Only one game will update at a time and all others will be placed in a line to update after the current one finishes.
There is zero point to concurrent downloads of games in the client.