安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



Get used to it.
I feel like video games are rapidly becoming the same way when it comes to AI. There may come a day where to insist on only buying "AI free games" is to stop buying games entirely.
IP is theft from society. Whether you're talking about people being left to die because they can't afford insulin or hollywood descending into stagnation because it has to 'leverage its IP portfolio rather than making a new movie'.
This whole thing really hammered home to me that 99% of artists consider themselves temporarily embarassed capital and not labor.
Yeahm but first there would be a need to discuss and determine what "abuse autocomplete" actually means.
And that can take anything from 5 minutes to 5.000 years.
On the image generation side stable diffusion, a common consumer hardware runnable model has a ~4gb model in a usable state, but used a dataset size of ~2-5 billion images, which amounts to less than 2 bytes of data per image if you calculate it that way. Despite that, with proper massaging it can produce things highly similar to what was used to make it.
Using Generative ai like stable diffusion in a commercial manner is legally and morally grey because of how it functions. What went in has been distilled so far from it's original form that has been turned into an unrecognizable soup. Yet it can recreate a facsimile of it.
the area we differ in is i see it as a morally black area that only remains legally gray because of the capture of the judiciary by bad actors. most importantly, i'm not asking for anyone to agree with me, i just want a way to ensure that i'm not made party to stealing from artists or programmers. it wouldn't be able to recreate facsimiles without the initial theft. now, machine learning is awesome. i think the work being done with it in astronomy, biology, and pharmaceuticals is amazing. i also have nothing against privately held models trained only from data that has been implicitly licensed for that use. but if at any point wholesale theft of the internet and use of unlicensed data was involved i want nothing to do with it, and i would like a way to filter it out of my steam experience.