安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



You were provided a way to do what you are wanting.
Imagine a game that just one-shots you without warning and no clue what happened when nothing is wrong with your build.
The game has a forum. You even got a developer response to the issue you posted. It sounds to me like you posted it in the right place already.
Reminds me when I'd roll up in Diablo 2 with maxed out poison resist from chapter 1 to chapter 2's boss Duriel, and get frozen stun locked by his ice aoe.
There are ways to detect and prevent this - check to see if the developer is reading them on time (or reading them at all).
If quality issues are not being attended to in a timely manner, add a decal on the store page noting that. This helps buyers make informed decisions and encourages high-quality games to rise to the top.
Plus that usage of game hubs is not mandatory.
Valve is very pro-developer. They give them freedom, choices and options.
Also, bug fixes don't indicate high quality games. A bad game with bugs fixed still remains a bad game. Just like bugs aren't always bugs, not having the right build for a boss isn't a bug (or bad design), for example.