安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I think my suggestion of a way to report heavily broken games directly on the store is still valid. There's a difference between I didn't like it, or it was a little buggy and - this whole game is not playable and will corrupt files and eat your system.
There are many devs who simply will not or cannot do anything to improve the situation, and hardly anyone I know is checking the game forums before making a purchase. I think a buyer-beware is a matter of informing the consumer. It's not even "you can't sell this", it's just an ethical "many people find this unplayable".
You can report games on their store page, outside of that, its up to Steam to decide whether a product should remain for sale.
Heavily broken games, dlc that you have yet to name after all not working on my PC is not heavily broken, especially when others are playing those games.
As for the game you played for 9 hours, the dlc is included in that playtime because the base game exe is running.
Come on. It's "slop" because your PC has inadequate cooling? The game may have poor optimization or be buggy, but overheating is definitely something you can fix. And, who knows, maybe that will solve the crashing.
If I had a dollar for every time some user blamed something out of the developer's control on the developer I'd be typing this on a gold plated keyboard from a private island.
And frankly as a developer I'm really pissed off about busted ass users, running busted ass systems, relying on busted ass logic for their claims.
The issue cuts both ways.
I do think there is something to be desired in these situations of customer dissatisfaction. The purpose of the refund system is to reduce this risk of buying rather than make you feel trapped with a bad product but at the same time it is difficult to stretch the system for your edge case and not support a bunch of abusive cases too. And you are not likely to find a better refund system with a competing market at least.
No it doesn't. You only want it to cut one way.
Well, you're wrong. Feel free to try again and this time try not to embarrass yourself.
My poking holes in OP's one sided elaborate narrative about the refund system protecting bad games because they think their situation is special or that bad games are a new phenomena might not yield the conclusions about my personal opinions as you seem to think.
Sometimes games are bad. Sometimes users are clueless morons prone to self-serving beliefs and assumptions. The. Issue. Cuts. Both. Ways.