安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Also do you really want ANOTHER faceless megacorp collecting such personal data on ye?
And the camera Age verification is instantly deleted (so they say).
so they say. What if a hacker has already compromised their system and his copying all images the moment they gt updated. I'd much rather not upload anything that cannot be changed if compromised
Blame your government. Vote out the ones responsible.
I understand that it would be more convenient for UK Steam users if Valve just did what the UK government asks, but as evident, they don't appear to be interested. Don't hold your breath for face scans or ID checks on Steam any time soon. You'll sooner just lose access entirely.
As for via mobile anyone can stand in front of the camera, but that does not mean it is you.
Laws? Not like companies haven't broken laws and used a persons private data to generate a profit before,.. Just a cost of business wen fines are lower than profits they make by breaking the law.
Haven't played online games for years, had I they still would not have a clue what I look like.
Edit, oh and while you said online games those hcks are no specific to online games. Regardless they will not know what I look like, Hackers wil know some stuff but nothing more than when PS got hacked back in PS3 days,
Germans have made the same arguments. So... either the loss or revenue isn't significant. Or it's acceptable to Valve for whatever reasons. Besides, who really believes a multi-billion dollar corporation doesn't understand the very basic arithmetic involved to generate the conclusion?
Not implementing any verification methods and restricting everyone to meet the requirements of the law is a valid implementation.
If other companies support more methods, buy games from them. Even if you're referring to non-gaming stores, Steam isn't the only PC game store.
Valve knows what its doing and is making informed decisions concerning their own business. They have some experience and data concerning how those decisions affect Germany and other countries. In short they understand the situation better than you. The problem may not be Valve's ignorance of the situation or decisions you don't agree with. It could be your ignorance of the situation and how much it actually impacts Valve to not implement (other) age verification. Overestimating consequences that don't agree with Valve's data might not make for a slam dunk argument.
For example: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ScAbRQpROaQ
Plus, people can sell such verification bypass as a third party service, which cannot be done with credit cards as they have to stay on the account on file.
Any minor can also use their parents credit card while they're not looking. As far as I understood it, Valve only requests authorization for a charge but don't actually capture it - i.e. you wouldn't see anything on a month's end transcript or such unless it specifically also shows authorized but uncollected charges. (Which is unlikely.)
Plenty of kids know the requisite info to use their parents' card(s) (with permission) as well, for actual occasional online purchases. Or because they're more tech-savvy than mom and dad and need to help them out with their online purchases. So the necessary credentials are not a road block at all.
Really, the fact that credit cards were considered to be a valid means of age verification is something of a joke, if you think about it.
why do you ask to solve the problem by making more problems?
It's easy to not get banned, just don't violate the rules.