安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



Steam would have to offer much more loosened refund options if they overestimated the capabilities of your system setup, be it drivers, interfering software or just misjudged hardware.
Liability. To the publisher:
Steam would be liable for missed sales if they underestimated the capabilities of your system setup, be it outdated hardware lists, misjudging benchmark results or due to interfering software.
The system requirement info fields are form free text fields instead of static fields in which to add or select hardware components from.
Valve would have to have a perfectly written and ranked database in which components are compared and benchmarked, something no vendor, not even specialized sites that benchmark hardware, can provide accurately due to exotic outliers.
No, Valve wouldn't do that.
There are a few Curators that can help...
https://psteamproxy.yuanyoumao.com/curator/30549202/
https://psteamproxy.yuanyoumao.com/curator/8073896-Low-End-Games/
https://psteamproxy.yuanyoumao.com/curator/7414568-Cheap-Low-End-Games/
https://psteamproxy.yuanyoumao.com/curator/8848323-Low-Spec-Gamers-United/
https://psteamproxy.yuanyoumao.com/curator/9009360-Low-End-Gamer%27s-Revolution/
https://psteamproxy.yuanyoumao.com/curator/27311639-Low-End-PC-Club/
And my favorite...
https://psteamproxy.yuanyoumao.com/curator/6865355-Good-Games-For-Your-Crappy-PC/
... and filter for what you wish.
After all, it does run DOOM.
Integrated graphics from 2014 for example. It's not impossible to set a baseline
https://psteamproxy.yuanyoumao.com/curator/34281606-LessThan100MB/
Do ye see the problem. Low-end is a moving goal post
No, I see that you're just trying to be critical without attempting to be constructive.. You can easily find what was considered low or high end in 2015, or any other year for that matter.
Sorry but I'm not discussing further with you, because it's just not useful for this thread.
Minimum requirements could =
720p low settings 30 fps with dips
720p low settings 30 fps
720p low settings 60 fps with dips
720p low settings 60 fps
720p med settings 30 fps with dips
720p med settings 30 fps
720p med settings 60 fps with dips
720p med settings 60 fps
720p high settings 30 fps with dips
720p high settings 30 fps
720p high settings 60 fps with dips
720p high settings 60 fps
1080p low settings 30 fps with dips
1080p low settings 30 fps
1080p low settings 60 fps with dips
1080p low settings 60 fps
1080p med settings 30 fps with dips
1080p med settings 30 fps
1080p med settings 60 fps with dips
1080p med settings 60 fps
Or any combination not mentioned above. If The requirements don't mean a specific quality//performance what chance would Steem have at being even remotely accurate? Not too mention patches can affect requirements and Game devs/pubs don't adjust requirements listed to match
Just use basic comparison sites till you LEARN you hardware. Had these 2 for my nephew. Have your hardware to one side and the games requirement to the other. Stick to comparing Nvidia GPU to Nvidia GPU, AMD GPU to AMD GPU, Intel CPU to Intel CPU, AMD CPU to AMD CPU. that way you shouldn't get any cross brand biases
https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-1050-Ti/3649vs3649
https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-2600-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-2600/3955vs3955
So you'd basically need people to be constantly evaluating whether or not their system is now high, mid, or low. And if they're doing that then this suggestion becomes redundant since they'd just as easily be able to tell based on the game's posted specs as is