所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Suggestions / Ideas > 主题详情
Hakirito 10 月 22 日 上午 12:07
How Long To Beat
**Suggestion: Add HowLongToBeat Integration to Steam Game Pages**

It would be interesting to add a new feature to each game's Steam Store page — integration with *HowLongToBeat*.

*HowLongToBeat* is a website that shows how long it takes to complete a game, achieve 100% completion, and more. Integrating this information directly into Steam would be very useful, similar to how the platform already displays Metacritic scores.

This feature would be especially helpful for users who want to know the average playtime before purchasing a game. It would benefit players looking for shorter experiences, those with limited gaming time, or even those who prefer games with many hours of gameplay.

I hope you like this suggestion — I believe it would be a great addition. It’s not a major or groundbreaking feature, but it’s something practical and enjoyable to have.

--- Hakirito
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条，共 36 条留言
a random horse 10 月 22 日 上午 12:09 
It would open steam up to being sued for false advertising, because how long to beat only measures an AVERAGE and doesn't take into account anything based in reality, like different people playing at different paces.
#1
Cantspel 10 月 22 日 上午 12:59 
引用自 a random horse：
It would open steam up to being sued for false advertising, because how long to beat only measures an AVERAGE and doesn't take into account anything based in reality, like different people playing at different paces.

I doubt this. GOG already does this with many of it's games. I personally wouldn't mind having an average play time on games. It would need to have some more complex math then just an average in order to filter out people who play for 1 second, and people who afk with the game on for days.
#2
a random horse 10 月 22 日 上午 1:01 
引用自 Cantspel：
引用自 a random horse：
It would open steam up to being sued for false advertising, because how long to beat only measures an AVERAGE and doesn't take into account anything based in reality, like different people playing at different paces.

I doubt this. GOG already does this with many of it's games. I personally wouldn't mind having an average play time on games. It would need to have some more complex math then just an average in order to filter out people who play for 1 second, and people who afk with the game on for days.
and how many games does GOG have vs what steam has? also i dont care if you believe me, because its the truth and 30 seconds with google would irrefutibly show you that.
#3
Cantspel 10 月 22 日 上午 1:05 
引用自 a random horse：
引用自 Cantspel：

I doubt this. GOG already does this with many of it's games. I personally wouldn't mind having an average play time on games. It would need to have some more complex math then just an average in order to filter out people who play for 1 second, and people who afk with the game on for days.
and how many games does GOG have vs what steam has? also i dont care if you believe me, because its the truth and 30 seconds with google would irrefutibly show you that.

What that people sue over how long a game lasts? Provide links of successful lawsuits I'll wait. The score would be provided by playtime of people playing the game. That's empirical fact and wouldn't be liable for slander. Truth is a very common, and most powerful defense for slander.
#4
a random horse 10 月 22 日 上午 1:07 
引用自 Cantspel：
引用自 a random horse：
and how many games does GOG have vs what steam has? also i dont care if you believe me, because its the truth and 30 seconds with google would irrefutibly show you that.

What that people sue over how long a game lasts? Provide links of successful lawsuits I'll wait. The score would be provided by playtime of people playing the game. That's empirical fact and wouldn't be liable for slander. Truth is a very common, and most powerful defense for slander.
you literally do not know what you are talking about trying to bring slander into this. Slander is SPOKEN, LIBEL is written. You're just tossing out words you don't know to fish for a 'win'. Blocked for being a troll.
最后由 a random horse 编辑于; 10 月 22 日 上午 1:08
#5
Cantspel 10 月 22 日 上午 1:13 
引用自 a random horse：
引用自 Cantspel：

What that people sue over how long a game lasts? Provide links of successful lawsuits I'll wait. The score would be provided by playtime of people playing the game. That's empirical fact and wouldn't be liable for slander. Truth is a very common, and most powerful defense for slander.
you literally do not know what you are talking about trying to bring slander into this. Slander is SPOKEN, LIBEL is written. You're just tossing out words you don't know to fish for a 'win'. Blocked for being a troll.

Either way my point still stands, even Libel wouldn't hold up in court as truth is still the strongest defense. I know you are just trolling, but this is for other people reading the thread. I know you will read this regardless of "blocking me" ;-)
#6
Cantspel 10 月 22 日 上午 1:36 
引用自 Cantspel：
I personally wouldn't mind having an average play time on games. It would need to have some more complex math then just an average in order to filter out people who play for 1 second, and people who afk with the game on for days.

Just to be clear, Average completion time would be useful, but also would be nice to have a general average total play time for games so that we can see if a game truly has replayability. This stat would also be more relevant for games that have live service elements to them.
最后由 Cantspel 编辑于; 10 月 22 日 上午 1:39
#7
Hakirito 10 月 22 日 上午 1:55 
引用自 a random horse：
It would open steam up to being sued for false advertising, because how long to beat only measures an AVERAGE and doesn't take into account anything based in reality, like different people playing at different paces.
Xbox use how long to beat in xbox app game pages https://imgur.com/a/Q05kF6m
最后由 Hakirito 编辑于; 10 月 22 日 上午 2:03
#8
Hakirito 10 月 22 日 上午 1:57 
I think there’s no problem with that, since several platforms — like Xbox itself, which has a huge catalog, and GOG — already use it. I believe there’s nothing wrong with it, but it should be analyzed by the Steam team, in my opinion.
#9
a random horse 10 月 22 日 上午 1:57 
引用自 Hakirito：
引用自 a random horse：
It would open steam up to being sued for false advertising, because how long to beat only measures an AVERAGE and doesn't take into account anything based in reality, like different people playing at different paces.
Xbox use how long to beat in xbox app game pages (https://imgur.com/a/Q05kF6m)
maliciously flagged link lmao
#10
Hakirito 10 月 22 日 上午 1:57 
引用自 Cantspel：
引用自 Cantspel：
I personally wouldn't mind having an average play time on games. It would need to have some more complex math then just an average in order to filter out people who play for 1 second, and people who afk with the game on for days.

Just to be clear, Average completion time would be useful, but also would be nice to have a general average total play time for games so that we can see if a game truly has replayability. This stat would also be more relevant for games that have live service elements to them.
Yep
#11
Hakirito 10 月 22 日 上午 1:58 
引用自 a random horse：
引用自 Hakirito：
Xbox use how long to beat in xbox app game pages (https://imgur.com/a/Q05kF6m)
maliciously flagged link lmao
its a imgur link lol
#12
a random horse 10 月 22 日 上午 1:58 
引用自 Hakirito：
引用自 a random horse：
maliciously flagged link lmao
its a imgur link lol
tell that to steam then. cause they gave it a bigass red warning
#13
Hakirito 10 月 22 日 上午 2:00 
引用自 a random horse：
引用自 Hakirito：
its a imgur link lol
tell that to steam then. cause they gave it a bigass red warning
lol
#14
a random horse 10 月 22 日 上午 2:01 
引用自 Hakirito：
引用自 a random horse：
tell that to steam then. cause they gave it a bigass red warning
lol
truth hurts. steam literally tells me that YOUR link, not any others, is possible malicious.
and seeing as Ive never seen this from steam before, I think I believe them over you.
#15
< >
正在显示第 1 - 15 条，共 36 条留言
每页显示数： 1530 50

所有讨论 > Steam 论坛 > Suggestions / Ideas > 主题详情
发帖日期： 10 月 22 日 上午 12:07
回复数： 36
发起新讨论

讨论规则及指引